Geez, do you know how uncomfortable it's making me to see my name in the
subject lines of dozens of messages?
At the risk of ruffling more feathers, I'd like to state for the record that
my mail program (Outlook) was set to send plain text _before_ I sent the
message that triggered all this traff
>>> What about those folk who insist on coloured fonts
>>> without colouring the background?
I have the other problem: colored backgrounds. I'm on Dell's email mailing
list. I periodically get email that is navy blue letters on dark blue
background. [sigh...]
Merrill
_
What about those folk who insist on coloured fonts
without colouring the background? Sometimes I have
a black bg, sometimes off-white; blue text looks
terrible, illegible, on both. I mean, HTML mail in
this context has little going for it, but when it
isn't even done properly
_
If we're voting, I'd just like to back Michael Erskine 100%;
all the way.
lee goddard
___
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-win32-users
ish, Merrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Joe Schell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: John Giordano, Ron Riley, etc. (ASCII PLS!)
> "Cornish, Merrill
Behalf Of
> Cameron Dorey
> Sent: Thursday 26 October 2000 17:17
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: John Giordano, Ron Riley, etc. (ASCII PLS!)
>
>
> Martin Moss wrote:
> >
> > Fair point,
> >
> > but the only major concern I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Cornish, Merrill
> >>> Starting sometime in March-June that restriction [on posting
> HTML] was
> lifted.
>
> I assume that was at the request of Microsoft.
So I realise that many people out there
"Cornish, Merrill" wrote:
>
> >>> Starting sometime in March-June that restriction [on posting HTML] was
> lifted.
>
> I assume that was at the request of Microsoft.
On what basis do you make that assumption?
Cameron
--
Cameron Dorey
Associate Professor of Chemistry
University of Central Ar
>>> Starting sometime in March-June that restriction [on posting HTML] was
lifted.
I assume that was at the request of Microsoft.
Merrill
___
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-win32-u
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Schell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 October 2000 16:50
> To: erskine, michael; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: John Giordano, Ron Riley, etc. (ASCII PLS!)
- >8 snip ---
> >
erskine, michael wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Everyone,
> >
> > I'm curious to other people's viewpoints regarding the html
> > email's issue.
>
> My viewpoint: Let's have a ban on html postings.
I agree :). And encourage good q
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 October 2000 16:42
> To: erskine, michael; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: John Giordano, Ron Riley, etc. (ASCII PLS!)
>
>
> Fair point,
>
> but the only major
> Behalf Of erskine, michael
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >
> > Everyone,
> >
> > I'm curious to other people's viewpoints regarding the html
> > email's issue.
>
> My viewpoint: Let's have a ban on html postings.
>
> > Taking on board
: Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 October 2000 16:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: John Giordano, Ron Riley, etc. (ASCII PLS!)
>
>
> Everyone,
>
> I'm curious to other people's viewpoints regarding the html
> email's issue.
My viewpoin
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 October 2000 16:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: John Giordano, Ron Riley, etc. (ASCII PLS!)
>
>
> Everyone,
>
> I'm curious to other people's viewpoints
15 matches
Mail list logo
