Pranav Desai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Aug 2002, Slaven Rezic wrote:
>
> > Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Pranav Desai wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All!
> > > >
> >
print "1..0 # Skip: File::Spec 0.8 needed\n";
+exit 0;
+}
print "1..8\n";
diff -urp /usr/local/src/bleedperl/ext/Storable/t/malice.t ./t/malice.t
--- /usr/local/src/bleedperl/ext/Storable/t/malice.tThu Aug 22 13:45:45 2002
+++ ./t/malice.tThu Oct 3 12:53:53 2002
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ sub BEGIN {
print "1..0 # Skip: Storable was not built\n";
exit 0;
}
+if ($] < 5.005) {
+print "1..0 # Skip: Config{ptrsize} not defined\n";
+exit 0;
+}
}
use strict;
Regards,
Slaven
--
Slaven Rezic - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tknotes - A knotes clone, written in Perl/Tk.
http://ptktools.sourceforge.net/#tknotes
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> >
> > On Thu 24 Oct 2002 00:58, Slaven Rezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since all on this mailing list use, er, email, it would be best to
> > > have the ability to c
Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Slaven Rezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > OK. If I do the patching --- should I patch against the CPAN version
> > of Scalar-List-Utils or the core version? Both are out of sync ---
> > there seem
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 18 Dec 2002 10:45, Slaven Rezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > I've seen on comp
ne
> error messages until one of these is encountered at compile time...
>
I have a module which solves this problem in a generic way and should
work for all pragmas. You say once:
use future qw(encoding sort warnings);
for all pragmas you want to be ignored with older perls and u
Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Slaven Rezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Maybe I missed something, but why scanning for perl module dependencies
> > at all? Core perl is not supposed to have any perl module prerequisites.
>
> You hit the na
