On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:30:00PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 04:42:34PM -0500, Stephen P. Potter wrote:
> > Not to mention "revisionist history". There were any number of uncourteous
> > voices during the RFC process.
>
> Exactly. Dan, weren't you the very person who h
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 06:08 PM 11/2/00 +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:44:50AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > Firstly, now, for the first time in the Perl history, we opened up the
> > > floodgates, so the speak, and had
Dear Head Developers, especially Larry & Nat!
I am a big perl fan (as most people here), and I dunno where I can
find up-to-date info about perl6. I am especially interested in how
you are going with the lang. spec and what the next step will be,
and what will be the timeline now.
I
John van V wrote:
> I have been predicting for a year now that perl6 will spawn another
> language which will be a marriage of perl/python/scheme/sh, hopefully
> enabling a billion or so humans in defiance of AOL and Microsoft.
Wow! You're good! Most people were caught by surprise with the Perl
