Recent changes to jit:
Register usage is now kept in an array per register type and is
calculated for non jitted sections too.
Register usage can be per section (a sequence of either jitted or
nonjitted ops not separated by branches) or per basic block. This
allows later to avoid some register
If memory serves me right, Leon Brocard wrote:
Loaded...
dlfunced...
../parrot: relocation error: /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0: undefined symbol:
pthread_mutexattr_init
I don't know if this is twisting the knife in the wound ... but it works
for me ...
[gopal@mushroom parrot]$ perl assemble.pl
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #18745]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18745
This config test looks if the fucomip instruction is available.
Question is,
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #18747]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18747
Hi,
I just hacked imcc to accept normal pasm files. About 85% of the test
are
On 11/28/2002 6:47 PM, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 18:08, Richard Nuttall wrote:
Doesn't
my $x=16#0:14
give you 2 digits rather than 1 ?
Yes, but the first digit is 0. Or, more accurately, 0 * 16**2.
I'm going to go on the assumption that it was either late or early in
Has there been any discussion about having an any type. Something such as:
my any $x = Hello;
$x = 17.3;
$x = Foo.new;
I realize that this can be accomplished with an untyped variable, but there may be a
reason not to do that. Namely, there most probably will be some sort of pragma like
use
Tanton Gibbs wrote:
Has there been any discussion about having an any type.
I realize that this can be accomplished with an untyped variable, but there
may be a reason not to do that. Namely, there most probably will be some
sort of pragma like use strict 'type' which will ensure every variable
Brent Dax wrote:
Dan Sugalski:
# which builds up a native call pmc that can be invoked. .
Oh JITters... ;^)
Here we go. d and i signatures currently, but it's easy to add more.
It passes the 2 (new) tests.
Currently, it's not integrated, add these lines to nci.c
#define
Jürgen Bömmels (via RT) wrote:
I just hacked imcc to accept normal pasm files. About 85% of the test
are still working, and its a major speed improvement. On my K6-350 I
get the following timings:
This is a speed improvement of about 350%.
Superb
The remaining failing tests
are mostly
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93
directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ?
Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the
befunge 98 specs, and the same interpreter
Hi,
I'd like to use multi-arrays, but I can't understand how they're
working. I looked at $PARROT/t/pmc/multiarray.t, but it's a bit
obscure.
Could you help me to understand them please? Or are they deprecated?
Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays? What are the
limitations of
Jerome Quelin wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to use multi-arrays, but I can't understand how they're
working. I looked at $PARROT/t/pmc/multiarray.t, but it's a bit
obscure.
underdocumented
Could you help me to understand them please? Or are they deprecated?
Yes/No
Should I use something else
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 17:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays?
multiarrays are mainly intended for huge packed multi dim arrays.
Then what should I use for a 2D array?
... What are the
limitations of multiarrays? I've read in
Nicholas Clark writes:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93
directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ?
Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the
befunge 98 specs, and
At 3:35 PM -0800 11/27/02, Bryan Hundven wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Bryan Hundven wrote:
Bryan,
you should suggest it on the perl6-internals mailinglist where
parrot development is happening. :-)
-ask
I don't know if anyone at parrotcode has thought of this idea, or
implemented it as a
Jerome Quelin wrote:
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 17:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Then what should I use for a 2D array?
The example (test) is an 2D array.
So, a so-called MultiArray is in fact one array, but the first n elems
are the elems of the 1st line, the next n elems are the 2nd
At 9:00 PM + 11/28/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Loaded...
dlfunced...
../parrot: relocation error: /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0: undefined
symbol: pthread_mutexattr_init
Well, the C code on the page works fine, but of course you have to
link it with -lpthread. How would I do this for the parrot
At 9:00 PM + 11/28/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
Also, at the moment I can't test this
OK, I've had a go. I'm basing the following on the code you mentioned
at http://use.perl.org/~Elian/journal/9147 (of course, you should know
better
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:14:39AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
Nicholas Clark writes:
This seems to be a good idea. I'd commit it, except that it needs more
than commit access to move a directory with CVS. Who has enough shell
access to cvs.perl.org to do this? [assuming it does want to be
Would it also be your job to do porting of subversion to VMS, so that we
could consider replacing CVS with something that lets clients do directory
moves? :-)
Sadly, no. :)
But I can tell you that I am actively investigating the use of
subversion for future use on perl.org projects. We're
# New Ticket Created by Alex Gough
# Please include the string: [perl #18762]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18762
t/pmc/nci.t doesn't like me or, at least, it doesn't like the way I
don't have a
First of all, apologies for sending through Hotmail; I'm home for the
weekend, and have no access to email. However, I figured I should
send this out as soon as I finished so that people have something to
think about besides numbers :)
Anyways, here's a first draft of the string documentation,
t/pmc/nci.t doesn't like me or, at least, it doesn't like the way I
don't have a lrint in my math.h. My KR claims that everything in
math.h ought to return a double (well, anything you can validly expect
to find in every math.h), so using math.so is probably not the way to
test the nci,
$string = 'one \qq{$var} two'# $string = 'one two three'
$string = 'one\qq{ {$var\} }two' # $string = 'one {two} three'
I think you mean s/two/three/ :
$string = 'one \qq{$var} three'# $string = 'one two three'
$string = 'one\qq{ {$var\} }three' # $string = 'one {two}
First, apologies for the typos; fixed.
Do you mean \Q or \Q{}, or both ?
\Q{}; \Q{} is different than \Q, at least according to the Apocalypse.
\Q{}Escape all characters that need escaping
from this point on in the current string (except })
Yeah.
Then
print
25 matches
Mail list logo
