signal/slot like mechanism

2003-03-07 Thread Yannick Le Saint
Hi guys, i was just wondering if some notification mechanism ( signal/slot alike ) was planned in perl 6, like they already are in glib and qt ? Or is it maybe better if implemented in some perl6 module (don't think so) ?? Or maybe this matter has already been discussed and is now

Re: Object spec

2003-03-07 Thread Andy Wardley
Sam Vilain wrote: Associations *are* fundamental object things. Presenting them in terms of attributes is the real hack. Associations *are* fundamental things, but I don't think they are part of an object. They describe relationships between objects and should exist independantly and

Re: signal/slot like mechanism

2003-03-07 Thread Luke Palmer
Hi guys, i was just wondering if some notification mechanism ( signal/slot alike ) was planned in perl 6, like they already are in glib and qt ? class Signal { has @.dest; method emit($code) { $code($_) for @.dest } method attach($obj) { push @.dest: $obj } } class

Re: Object spec

2003-03-07 Thread Paul
--- Andy Wardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Associations *are* fundamental things, but I don't think they are part of an object. They describe relationships between objects and should exist independantly and orthogonal to them. Agreed. Is there any reason that shouldb't be done with something

Re: signal/slot like mechanism

2003-03-07 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:27 PM + 3/6/03, Yannick Le Saint wrote: Hi guys, i was just wondering if some notification mechanism ( signal/slot alike ) was planned in perl 6, like they already are in glib and qt ? I'm not exactly sure what you're looking for, since I'm not too familiar with qt or glib, but if you

Re: Object spec [x-adr][x-bayes]

2003-03-07 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 2:08 PM +1300 3/7/03, Sam Vilain wrote: As long as mechanisms are put in place to allow modules to bypass object encapsulation and private/public constraints, and given that Parrot will have no XS, It wouldn't be wise to jump from Parrot won't do perl 5's XS scheme to Parrot won't have a way

Re: Object spec [x-adr][x-bayes]

2003-03-07 Thread Sam Vilain
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 06:58, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 2:08 PM +1300 3/7/03, Sam Vilain wrote: As long as mechanisms are put in place to allow modules to bypass object encapsulation and private/public constraints, and given that Parrot will have no XS, It wouldn't be wise to jump from Parrot

[perl #21508] [PATCH] more sun4 jit changes

2003-03-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jason Gloudon # Please include the string: [perl #21508] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21508 This adds still more ops and re-organizes register use to avoid potential

Re: [perl #21508] [PATCH] more sun4 jit changes

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:38:41PM +, Jason Gloudon wrote: # New Ticket Created by Jason Gloudon # Please include the string: [perl #21508] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21508 This adds

Re: IMCC and multiple source files

2003-03-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Joseph F. Ryan wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: I don't have a docs/macros.pod. I guess my version of imcc is old (-: The update your parrot please. A lot of these issues are documented and solved. For instance, in the interests of speed, it would be nice if perl6 builtins written in perl6