Re: [perl #23064] [PATCH] Fix copyright notices

2003-07-20 Thread chromatic
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 10:30 AM, Josh Wilmes (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Josh Wilmes # Please include the string: [perl #23064] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23064 > Here's a first pass, just

Abbreviation

2003-07-20 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
In /parrot/docs/jit.pod: "For moving registers from processor to parrot and vv, the B functions have to be implemented." what does "vv" stand for?

RE: [WIP PATCH] core.ops split-up

2003-07-20 Thread Brent Dax
Finally got some feedback through IRC--trans.t and object.t were failing. object.t works for me (miracle of miracles, considering the other test failures on Windows), but trans.t was easy to figure out--I'd copied the transcendental ops from core.ops and never pasted them into math.ops. *rolls ey

Re: Events

2003-07-20 Thread Michal Wallace
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >It would be entirely possible for Parrot (or a Parrot library) to > >use AIO at a low level, without introducing interrupts to the VM layer. > Sure. But what'd be the point? Adding in interrupts allows a number > of high-performance idioms that aren't

[perl #23063] [PATCH] run make test with valgrind

2003-07-20 Thread Jürgen
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels # Please include the string: [perl #23063] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23063 > Hello, for searching memory leaks it to run the testsuite with valgrind. The attached

Unsubscribing (was RE: [WIP PATCH] core.ops split-up)

2003-07-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:15 AM +0800 7/21/03, K.N.Vishwanath wrote: How do I get out of this list please? The mailing list software puts the list contact and unsubscribe information in every message that goes out--it's in the headers. In this case, the info is: List-Unsubscribe: --

RE: [WIP PATCH] core.ops split-up

2003-07-20 Thread K.N.Vishwanath
How do I get out of this list please? Vish -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Benjamin Goldberg Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WIP PATCH] core.ops split-up At 11:47 AM +0200 7/19/03, Leopold Toe

Re: [WIP PATCH] core.ops split-up

2003-07-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:47 AM +0200 7/19/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could we try and clean up the parrot/ directory? Specifically, I'd like all of the source code itself moved into a single subdirectory, leaving at the toplevel only directories, the all-caps files, a

Re: Events

2003-07-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 3:25 PM -0700 7/18/03, Damien Neil wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:58:41PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: and event loop i/o doesn't usually support async file i/o. many people conflate the two. event i/o handles sockets, pipes and such but none support files. the issue is that the async file i/

Re: Aliasing an array slice

2003-07-20 Thread David Storrs
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:05:52PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote: > What would happen if I used 1,2,3 instead of 1..3? Would it do the same > thing? I would think so. > I wanna know what happens if I do: > >@a[0,2,4] = qw/ a b c d e /; Yup, you're right, I didn't consider non-cont

Re: [PATCH] gcc optimizer bug workaround in SArray

2003-07-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gcc 3.2 has a bug that makes SArray's shift_* not work when compiled > with optimization. This works around it (and is arguably better style > anyway). gcc will receive a bug report if I can manage to reduce the > problem. Thanks, applied. leo