Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically all metadata has to be collected before any code can be emitted.
I was thinking of generating an _init routine that creates the classes,
so we have several possibilities.
Why? A class definition should AFAIK end up in the constant table as a
Presuming you can do:
(who = $name, why = $reason) := (why = $because, who = me);
(from A6)
Does that imply that you can do:
sub routine (name = $nombre, date = $fecha) {...}
Anyway, I just realized that this is finally an elegant way to do
multiple, unordered return values:
I'm about to add a POD test program to my phalanx distro.
Before I do that, just want to check I'm using the best model.
I plan on using the one from WWW::Mechanize (shown below) --
unless someone can suggest a better model.
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?
Personally, I'd just as soon not have it be one of the numeric ones. It
doesn't matter what order it's run in.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com =
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #24289]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24289
Hi,
after the promotion of 'languages/imcc' I was checking
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Simon Glover wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:43 PM -0400 10/23/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
And I could certainly do with some help at this point.
Parrot is *almost* put back together. There's some weird linking problem
that's keeping parrot from
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
I'm working on getting class syntax added to PIR.
It appears IMCC's way of emitting instructions as it collects compilation
was a mistake (mine) and isn't going to work for metadata that needs to
be initialized first.
Basically all metadata has to
At 08:36 AM 10/24/2003 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically all metadata has to be collected before any code can be emitted.
I was thinking of generating an _init routine that creates the classes,
so we have several possibilities.
Why? A class
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:20:34 -0400 (EDT), Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
2) I don't see it as a huge problem that serialization code could end
up creating additional objects if called from a destroy() method.
User code may, parrot may not. The reasons are
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:39:38 -0400 (EDT), Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
This is a question of what is allowed at destruction time. You don't
want to allow memory allocation, but allow freezing. That gets hard,
because you need at least allocate the STRING
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:39:38 -0400 (EDT), Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
This is a question of what is allowed at destruction time. You don't
want to allow memory allocation, but allow freezing. That gets hard,
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:36 AM 10/24/2003 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Why? A class definition should AFAIK end up in the constant table as a
class PMC specifying the inheritance and attributes. So a .class
directive is from parsing POV a constant definition, like a string
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:33:17 +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
[stuff he didn't mean to send]
Sorry. Looks like I hit Send instead of Cancel.
--
Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this system is slightly less secure than putting your IP address and
root password in big letters in a
For those not on the cvs-commit list..
Added newsub and newclosure to PIR. Hides some implementation detail and
allows IMCC to take advantage of the newsub opcode which is much more
efficient than new/set_addr combination. This makes PIR orthogonal
between new and newsub.
Example:
PIR
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:23:52PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?
Probably not worth the inevitable argument.
use Test::More;
use File::Spec;
use File::Find;
use strict;
eval {
15 matches
Mail list logo
