Markus Laire writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
Please,
I have a question if exists in Perl somethink like keyword
'operator' in C++ ?
That will exist in perl6.
And to quite a larger extent. Not only can you overload existing
operators, you can make up whatever operator name you like.
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 5:04 PM -0500 1/18/05, Sam Ruby wrote:
f = Parrot.find
print f(r)
Note that I referenced the method as an attribute, and then called
it as a function.
Mmm, syntax! :) Luckily it makes no difference to us at the parrot
level. What that should
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #33986]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33986
- dynclasses files aren't rebuilt e.g. on include header changes
-
I've now committed the source of the generational mark sweep GC system.
Some remarks:
- it's by far not finished
- fails still a lot of tests [1]
- to turn it on set PARROT_GC_SUBSYSTEM to 2 in settings.h
- you might also turn on GC_GMS_DEBUG when hacking on the code
- it should be documented
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 5:04 PM -0500 1/18/05, Sam Ruby wrote:
f = Parrot.find
print f(r)
Note that I referenced the method as an attribute, and then called
it as a function.
Mmm, syntax! :) Luckily it makes no difference to us at the parrot
level.
I would like to do my own preemptive multitasking within a
single-threaded application.
When a timer fires, I'd like to:
1. suspend the current computation
2. put it on the back of a work queue
3. resume the lambda on the top of the work queue.
Will Parrot facilitate this? Thank you for insight
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
2) by a distinct Bound_Meth PMC class derived from 1)
The latter is probably cleaner. Binding the object to the callable could
be done e.g. by the Cset_pmc vtable.
That's exactly how PyBoundMeth works today.
Cset_pointer sets the
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
2) by a distinct Bound_Meth PMC class derived from 1)
The latter is probably cleaner. Binding the object to the callable could
be done e.g. by the Cset_pmc vtable.
That's exactly how PyBoundMeth works today.
Thanks to Matt Diephouse, about 30+ tickets have just been properly marked as
resolved. (Though I physically closed them, he did all the legwork. Someone
make him a bugadmin, please.)
This leaves 268 documented issues in RT, plus whatever is lurking in CVS. 50% of
these are -new-, despite the
I have just noticed an anomalous difference in output between two of the
files created by the Devel::Cover 'cover' utility when run against a
popular Perl module -- and I am wondering whether this difference should
be considered a feature or a bug.
The module in question is Text::Template,
I'd guess it is because you are seeing the output of the code after it
has been compiled-then-decompiled - it is compiled so it can run and
coverage statistics can be collected, then it is decompiled to relate
coverage stats to code lines. Now there are many ways to write code that
compiles to
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #33995]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33995
The recent gdbmhash configure check causes the following output on my system
Comrade Burnout wrote:
I'm not sure where to start other than this. So hi and stuff.
Hi, Brian.
--
Ian Langworth
Project Guerrilla
Northeastern University
College of Computer and Information Science
I remember seeing that the list-joining thingie mentioned an
introduction once someone joined, so here it is:
I'm geektron on perlmonks, and Brian Clarkson IRL.
I've talked a bit to Mr. Lester and Mr. Kinyon about tests, and decided
that learning some good testing skills while doing something
14 matches
Mail list logo
