Re: ubuntu-ppc-trunk BUILD FAILED

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Cochrane
Matisse, this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and central location for the information. Paul [1] http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?parrot Both passing and failing builds from buildbot

Re: [perl #49744] Uninitialized variables on Fink

2008-01-14 Thread Alberto Simões
Much better :) The attached patch failed to patch MANIFEST, but I think that is not critical here :) Cheers James Keenan via RT wrote: Alberto: Does the attached work for you? -- Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho Campus de Gualtar -

[perl #49744] Uninitialized variables on Fink

2008-01-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
Patch applied in r24843. Resolved.

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Jan 14, 2008 12:38 PM, Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: Was there a programming perl book for Perl 1? Or any other books? For now I'm kinda stuck, because I don't know the exact semantics of each construct of Perl 1. I ran into the same thing. The first

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Allison Randal
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: Was there a programming perl book for Perl 1? Or any other books? For now I'm kinda stuck, because I don't know the exact semantics of each construct of Perl 1. I ran into the same thing. The first edition of Programming perl wasn't until Perl 4. The best you're going

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Allison Randal
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: Unless I misunderstood the Yacc/bison manual, the /order/ in which the operator associativity is declared, defines the precedence, from top to bottom in increasing order. So: %left '+' '-' %left '*' '/' '%' means that *, / and % take precedence over + and -. Aye, but

[perl #49276] [BUG] http://smoke.parrotcode.org/smoke/ failing to display submitted smoke report

2008-01-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
I continue to experience the problem but have partially diagnosed it. The value for 'cc' in the uploaded smoke.html was: /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 But smokeserve-server.pl only wants values for 'cc' which match this pattern: [\w\d]+ Once I manually edited the file to say 'gcc', server.pl indexed the

Parrot Bug Summary

2008-01-14 Thread Parrot Bug Summary
Parrot Bug Summary http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html Generated at Mon Jan 14 14:00:06 2008 GMT --- * Numbers * New Issues * Overview of Open Issues * Ticket Status By Version * Requestors with

[perl #49758] [BUG] Bus error in HLL interactive mode.

2008-01-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #49758] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49758 % make perl6 #in the top level directory. % ./perl6 $a=1; No scope found for

Re: [perl #45137] [TODO] Add a revision control test in Configure.pl

2008-01-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote: On Mon Sep 03 12:45:03 2007, doughera wrote: Well grepping my output log file shows 18 lines, so it's more than just t/distro_file_metadata.t: $ egrep '(svn|svk|git): not found' build.log | wc 18 Andy D: When I invoked

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:35:57PM -0500, jesse wrote: If only Perl1 source would compile, then it'd be easier, but it doesn't compile on windows (xp) and can't get it working on cygwin either. That sounds like the sort of situation where VMWare Player and, say, an ubuntu or redhat

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Ron Blaschke
jesse wrote: If only Perl1 source would compile, then it'd be easier, but it doesn't compile on windows (xp) and can't get it working on cygwin either. That sounds like the sort of situation where VMWare Player and, say, an ubuntu or redhat virtual machine might come in really handy. I don't

Re: [perl #47395] t/configure/115-auto-warnings.t assumes cc -Wall works.

2008-01-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote: I was studying Jarkko's patch this morning in preparation for applying it. I had a number of concerns. 1. It turned out that at the point the patch was originally submitted, HEAD had moved a bit beyond the version against which Jarkko

Re: Gearing up for Parrot release 0.5.2

2008-01-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Bob Rogers wrote: From: Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:43:24 -0500 (EST) Please verify that it actually works, first. Last I checked (Friday) it didn't, due to linker issues. I also recall some guesswork on the list about

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Jan 14, 2008 5:57 PM, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 11:29 AM, Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jesse wrote: I don't believe Perl 1 was ever ported to Windows. Well, actually it kinda was. ;-)

Re: [perl #44269] [TODO] Need more meaningful comment in Parrot Bug Summary

2008-01-14 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
James Keenan via RT schrieb: This ticket has obviously not generated much interest since I opened it lo these five months ago. Coke and I had some IRC discussion of something he's developing that's related to it, but I haven't heard from anyone else. So, let me ask again: When you see the

[perl #49762] [configure] JIT configuration problems on OS X

2008-01-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Simon Cozens # Please include the string: [perl #49762] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49762 osname= darwin osvers= 9.0 arch= darwin-thread-multi-2level cc= cc --- Flags:

Re: Gearing up for Parrot release 0.5.2

2008-01-14 Thread chromatic
On Monday 14 January 2008 08:56:08 Andy Dougherty wrote: It doesn't work for me on Solaris. What to do with that information, I leave up to you. The next step is to get some debugging information. What's the generated compilation line? What's wrong with it? What should the right one be?

[perl #49314] [PATCH] pbc_to_exe should list libraries last

2008-01-14 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Wed Jan 02 10:18:49 2008, doughera wrote: In order to get pbc_to_exe to work with the Solaris linker, I had to move the libraries to the end of the link line. That's not surprising -- traditional Unix linkers process items in the link line in order. At the point where libparrot.a is

Re: Gearing up for Parrot release 0.5.2

2008-01-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, chromatic wrote: On Monday 14 January 2008 08:56:08 Andy Dougherty wrote: It doesn't work for me on Solaris. What to do with that information, I leave up to you. The next step is to get some debugging information. What's the generated compilation line? What's

Re: [perl #49314] [PATCH] pbc_to_exe should list libraries last

2008-01-14 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 10:18:49 Andy Dougherty wrote: In order to get pbc_to_exe to work with the Solaris linker, I had to move the libraries to the end of the link line. That's not surprising -- traditional Unix linkers process items in the link line in order. At the point where

[perl #49766] toplevel 'make perl6' needs dependency fixup.

2008-01-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #49766] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49766 In the top level directory, type: 'make perl6' a perl6 binary is created. now

Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Ron Blaschke
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 5:57 PM, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 11:29 AM, Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jesse wrote: I don't believe Perl 1 was ever ported to Windows. Well, actually it kinda was. ;-)

Re: [perl #44269] [TODO] Need more meaningful comment in Parrot Bug Summary

2008-01-14 Thread Will Coleda
On Jan 14, 2008 11:58 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Keenan via RT schrieb: This ticket has obviously not generated much interest since I opened it lo these five months ago. Coke and I had some IRC discussion of something he's developing that's related to it, but I

[perl #49762] [configure] JIT configuration problems on OS X

2008-01-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
Assuming we knew *how* to fix this, my hunch is that the appropriate *place* to fix it would be config/init/hints/darwin.pm.

Synopsis smartlinks don't display correctly...

2008-01-14 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Since I refactored the S29 tests into t/spec/S29-str, the smartlinks don't display correctly anymore. If you go here: http://perlcabal.org/syn/S29.html you will see that test scripts like Context/eval display correctly, while Str/split is messed up, seems with newline problems. Anyone knows

Re: ubuntu-ppc-trunk BUILD FAILED

2008-01-14 Thread Matisse Enzer
On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote: Matisse, this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and central location for the information. Yes - I will take a whack at doing that. Also: If anyone

[perl #47395] t/configure/115-auto-warnings.t assumes cc -Wall works.

2008-01-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
I will wait until after the release to apply the patch.

[perl #44187] [RFC] Configure.pl: --configure_trace option too verbose

2008-01-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
No feedback; closing ticket.

[perl #45137] [TODO] Add a revision control test in Configure.pl

2008-01-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Mon Jan 14 07:41:36 2008, doughera wrote: Apparently not. I am looking at the case where I have neither svn nor svk nor git available in $PATH. During the original Configure.pl run, I see: Determining whether (exuberant) ctags is installed..no.sh: svn: not

Re: ubuntu-ppc-trunk BUILD FAILED

2008-01-14 Thread Matisse Enzer
On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote: Matisse, this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and central location for the information. Paul [1]

Re: [perl #49762] [configure] JIT configuration problems on OS X

2008-01-14 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
What is the OSX toolchain solution for inline asm with fat binaries? At some point we have to assume that people who are setting CFLAGS know what they are doing. We can't look for or protect against every silly thing they might do. Perhaps if --jitcapable is set and we're on darwin the thing to

[perl #49780] [config] m4 doesn't hang, it does its job...

2008-01-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Simon Cozens # Please include the string: [perl #49780] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49780 There's some code in config to detect 'm4 --version' hanging on FreeBSD. It