First, kudos and compliments to Klaas-Jan Stol on the excellent
PCT tutorial. I have some comments; the minor ones (typos, etc.)
I'll send off-list, but others may merit some discussion and
PCT implementation changes so I'll put them here.
This message has to do with scope handling of variables
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 01:04:22AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
This message has to do with scope handling of variables in Episode 6
of the tutorial (the 'identifier' method for Squaak). The tutorial
points out an area where PCT doesn't yet work the way I had
envisioned and solicits
Imagine my delight upon reading this in the Perl 6 Design Team minutes:
* also had a contact from someone who wants to port OpenGL to Parrot
* not Geoff Broadwell
* seems like a very serious approach
Ouch! You wound me, sir!
Just for the record, I've attached my OpenGL/GLUT proof of
I'm not sure I'm really qualified to answer this, since I'm not really a
Perlistanian, but in general, if something shipping with Parrot depends on
something else, it should be in the Parrot tree (in either source or binary
form, whichever is more convenient and/or makes the most sense). If
# New Ticket Created by Seneca Cunningham
# Please include the string: [perl #5]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=5
This failure is not visible in prove -v output.
herodotus:parrot seneca$
# New Ticket Created by Seneca Cunningham
# Please include the string: [perl #52224]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52224
Parrot::Test uses the full path of the test script to determine which
# New Ticket Created by Seneca Cunningham
# Please include the string: [perl #52220]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52220
herodotus:parrot seneca$ ./parrot t/op/01-parse_ops_335.pasm
Bus error
Crash
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:42 PM, via RT Seneca Cunningham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Seneca Cunningham
# Please include the string: [perl #52220]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
On Fri Mar 28 21:03:12 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot::Test uses the full path of the test script to determine which
optimization flags to pass parrot. The method used causes the bogus
optimization value '/' to be extracted when running the tests in
/opt/foo as the character
Coke et al.:
Please evaluate the patch attached for commitment to trunk. As per my
most recent post, it does not eliminate Parrot::Revision completely, but
it does limit its scope to 'svn'.
kid51
Index: tools/build/revision_c.pl
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:55:30 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Am confused. What diagnostic output beyond 'prove -v' are you referring
to?
For example...
t/op/arithmetics1..26
ok 1 - take the negative of a native integer
ok 2 - take the absolute of
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #52230]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52230
the code pmc.ops :96-97 seems redundant: pmc_type() is called twice
with the
As of this morning only the following files still need conversion
for P6Regex, P6Grammar, and/or pgc:
examples/pge/all.pir
languages/tap/Makefile
The examples/pge/all.pir file is a very outdated example of
writing parsers using PGE -- the new way of doing it is
to use Perl6Grammar or
On Saturday 29 March 2008 06:50:51 jerry gay wrote:
the contents of t/op/01-parse_ops_335.pasm should be somewhere between
2 and 12 lines. could you paste it inline? it would help us find the
op(s) causing the segfault.
The code is:
end
yield
... and it crashes because
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:03:17 -0700
James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we simply add a forward slash after 'opt', does that solve the
problem? (see attached)
Should this code really be checking the absolute pathname? We don't
have any control over where a user places a parrot
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:59:25 -0700
Mark Glines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This changes Parrot::Test's behavior: an alternate -O option will
only be used if the *filename* contains optN, not if a leading
directory name contains it. I don't see any uses of optN in
directory names in the parrot
On 29/03/2008, James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri Mar 28 21:03:12 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot::Test uses the full path of the test script to determine which
optimization flags to pass parrot. The method used causes the bogus
optimization value '/' to be
Oops. I only reported the $extraLibs patch to the mailinglist.
diff -ub ./CREDITS.orig
--- ./CREDITS.orig 2008-03-16 08:15:14.0 +0100
+++ ./CREDITS 2008-03-20 11:31:01.5 +0100
@@ -514,6 +514,10 @@
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.bofh.org.uk:8080/
+N: Reini Urban
+E:
On Saturday 29 March 2008 09:01:21 Stephane Payrard wrote:
the code pmc.ops :96-97 seems redundant: pmc_type() is called twice
with the same args for no apparent reason. And it seems to be a pure
function.
same for another pmc creator.
I recompiled the patched code and tested rakudo
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 06:25:32 Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
I don't commit this myself, because I want to check whether this
practice of localizing vars. is ok, as it introduces else clauses.
That seems reasonable.
Not sure whether which is better. My personal preference is the patch,
On Saturday 29 March 2008 11:58:53 Reini Urban via RT wrote:
Oops. I only reported the $extraLibs patch to the mailinglist.
Thanks, applied in full as r26632.
-- c
On Saturday 29 March 2008 09:42:55 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
As of this morning only the following files still need conversion
for P6Regex, P6Grammar, and/or pgc:
examples/pge/all.pir
languages/tap/Makefile
The examples/pge/all.pir file is a very outdated example of
writing
On Saturday 29 March 2008 07:22:35 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Please evaluate the patch attached for commitment to trunk. As per my
most recent post, it does not eliminate Parrot::Revision completely, but
it does limit its scope to 'svn'.
Remove the commented-out code and +1 from me.
-- c
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 07:15:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached patch favors make over nmake on cygwin only, because there's
normally no gmake, but sometimes a nmake in the PATH.
Thanks, applied as r26633.
-- c
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:14:03 James Keenan wrote:
This is one of a series of tickets reporting issues encountered at a
Parrot/Rakudo buildfest held at Toronto Perlmongers on March 27, 2008.
On the same Win32 box mentioned in RT 52198, the developer attempted
to build Rakudo, but 'say
On Thursday 27 March 2008 18:20:21 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Actually, it can be done without subclassing via the following
.namespace [ 'ResizablePMCArray' ]
.sub 'unshift' :method
.param pmc list
.param pmc value
unshift list, value
.end
.sub 'shift' :method
.param
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 06:57:46 Reini Urban wrote:
I like the idea of make perl6 only on windows.
make perl6.exe is just a file, make perl6 is a whole new world :)
One could
ifdef WINDIR
perl6 : $(PERL6)
endif
for the GNU-style makefile on cygwin
and with the appropriate nmake
On Thursday 13 December 2007 19:32:11 Will Coleda wrote:
For example, parrotclass.pmc, parrotobject.pmc.
... Should this file be auto-generated?
That's not easy, because config/auto/pmc.pm uses it to allow people to select
at configuration time which PMCs to include and exclude.
I'm not
S06.pod says (line 2698):
: Ordinarily a top-level Perl script just evaluates its anonymous
: mainline code and exits. During the mainline code, the program's
: arguments are available in raw form from the C@ARGS array. At the end of
: the mainline code, however, a CMAIN subroutine will be
On Friday 09 November 2007 00:24:43 Paul Cochrane wrote:
I'll have a go at testing against the exec runcore and see what turns
up. This is likely something we should be testing more often right?
Definitely.
I ran a fulltest with this patch applied, and everything's fine on x86 (where
it
In general, is
[op] (p1,p2,p3,p4...)
expected to return the same result as
p1 op p2 op p3 op p4...
including precedence considerations?
That is, should
[**](2,3,4)
return 2^(3^4)=2^81, or (2^3)^4 = 4096?
--
Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: larry
Date: Sat Mar 29 20:16:29 2008
New Revision: 14529
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
fossil noticed by pmichaud++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:18:53PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: In general, is
:
: [op] (p1,p2,p3,p4...)
:
: expected to return the same result as
:
: p1 op p2 op p3 op p4...
:
: including precedence considerations?
:
: That is, should
:
: [**](2,3,4)
:
: return 2^(3^4)=2^81, or (2^3)^4 =
You anticipated me. So, is there a core method for
foldl/foldr/inject/reduce, or do you have to roll your own as in p5?
On 3/29/08, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:18:53PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: In general, is
:
: [op] (p1,p2,p3,p4...)
:
: expected to
34 matches
Mail list logo
