Bob Rogers wrote:
The attached patch (against the trunk) adds a case which fails in
pdd25cx but works in trunk. Should I go ahead and commit it, and if so,
to branch, trunk or both?
Looks like you forgot to attach the patch.
Allison
The error seems to be in the generated PIR code. From
src/gen_actions.pir (lines 6306-6315):
control_3001:
.local pmc exception
.get_results (exception, $S10)
getattribute $P3250, exception, type # Null PMC access in type()
ne $P3250, 89, control_3001_rethrow
getattribute
I noticed a couple commits overnight for Lua to support OpenGL. I'm a
bit confused by them, since they don't seem to actually *do* anything,
just lots of (hopefully automatically generated!) scaffolding.
fperrad: How do these bindings actually work?
Everyone:
We're getting to the stage that
Geoffrey Broadwell schrieb:
I've noticed several patches from you today in which you're adding code
to try to load an existing library under additional library names for
cygwin support. It's beginning to look like this is a common operation.
See =item loadlib DLL versioning in
On Sun Jul 13 19:25:11 2008, pmichaud wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:00:29AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Here's a question I have -- what are the various use cases for running
the various test targets? Perhaps if we enumerate the use cases we
could understand it better and make our
On Sat Jul 12 11:00:27 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
particle's original post was one I requested he make as follow-up to a
discussion that he, chromatic and I had concerning configuration at
YAPC::NA::2008 in Chicago (with additional input from Steve Lembark).
That discussion concerned
On Thu Jun 26 12:46:10 2008, coke wrote:
In that case, Memoize will not help, you're absolutely right. (Might
be worth seeing if the code is amenable to a refactor that -would- be
amenable to this, but that's probably more work.)
If no one currently has any more ideas on the subject of
On Sunday 20 July 2008 17:37:28 James Keenan via RT wrote:
If no one currently has any more ideas on the subject of this ticket, I
will close it.
Running it less frequently -- over all PMCs at once -- would speed it up,
especially on Windows. Unfortunately, that would introduce a bottleneck
1 test still not passing as of r29636:
not ok 36 - invalid label syntax # TODO RT#47978, RT#51104
# Failed (TODO) test 'invalid label syntax'
# at t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t line 469.
# 'compilers/imcc/imcc.l:1010: failed assertion 'valp-s'
# Backtrace - Obtained 10 stack
This is the situation on both Linux and Darwin (r29636) today.
$ prove -v t/stm/runtime.t
t/stm/runtime
1..5
ok 1 - choice (one thread)
ok 2 # SKIP Intermittently failing everywhere
ok 3 # SKIP Intermittently failing everywhere
ok 4 - queue adapted for the library
ok 5 - queue (non-blocking;
On Sunday 20 July 2008 18:19:05 James Keenan via RT wrote:
1 test still not passing as of r29636:
not ok 36 - invalid label syntax # TODO RT#47978, RT#51104
# Failed (TODO) test 'invalid label syntax'
# at t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t line 469.
#
Not long ago, Allison Randal proclaimed...
After temporarily disabling the graph coloring register allocator, the
pdd25cx branch passes all Parrot tests. Please run the tests for your
language and report/debug any test failures that are different than the
test failures in trunk.
The plan
12 matches
Mail list logo
