Author: lwall
Date: 2009-07-09 02:36:00 +0200 (Thu, 09 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 27487
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S14-roles-and-parametric-types.pod
Log:
[S14] a slightly closer approximation to eventual reality
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S14-roles-and-parametric-types.pod
===
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
>> It's Parrot behavior. It's trivial to change to "Too many params passed" or
>> "Too many results passed". Would that be clearer?
>
> Maybe, but the problem as described in the original ticket was the
> inconsistency of '1' and 'params' with an
chromatic (>), Kyle (>>):
>> In this case, it might be easiest to leave the word out:
>>
>> Too many arguments passed (2) - 1 expected.
>>
>> Even this looks not too bad to me:
>>
>> Too many arguments passed (1) - 0 expected.
>
> It's Parrot behavior. It's trivial to change to "Too many params pa
Hi all,
It's been interesting to participate in the roles discussion so far, and
I'm happy to see there's a lot of interest in getting the right options
and the right defaults. I'm leaving tomorrow morning on vacation, and
will be mostly offline for a week or so (the alps are quite a
distract
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:44:24PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
>> rakudo 70bfd5: OUTPUT«1.48547529722733»
>> our Num multi method log ( Num $x: Num :$base = Num::e ) is export
>> it *should* work.
>
> Please please please don't constrain the arguments to Num when
> you
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 14:56:11 Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
> In this case, it might be easiest to leave the word out:
>
> Too many arguments passed (2) - 1 expected.
>
> Even this looks not too bad to me:
>
> Too many arguments passed (1) - 0 expected.
It's Parrot behavior. It's trivial to chan
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:59:53PM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
> Ovid wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see something like this (or whatever the equivalent Perl 6
>> syntax would be):
>>
>> class PracticalJoke does Bomb does SomeThingElse {
>> method fuse() but overrides { ... }
>> }
>>
>> The "overrid
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:44:24PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> rakudo 70bfd5: OUTPUT«1.48547529722733»
> our Num multi method log ( Num $x: Num :$base = Num::e ) is export
> it *should* work.
Please please please don't constrain the arguments to Num when
you actually write this.
Pm
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> rakudo 70bfd5: OUTPUT«too many arguments passed (2) - 1
> params expected [...]
In this case, it might be easiest to leave the word out:
Too many arguments passed (2) - 1 expected.
Even this looks not too bad to me:
Too many arguments passed
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67358 >
actually, I see another bug there... :)
rakudo: say log(1, 10)
rakudo 70bfd5: OUTPUT«
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67356]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67356 >
rakudo: my @P = 0.2, 0.5, 0.3; say -[+] @P.map: { $^p * log($^p, 2) }
rakudo 70bfd5: O
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-07-08 23:41:43 +0200 (Wed, 08 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 27485
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
Log:
[S32/Num] log's base is positional
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
Ovid wrote:
I'd like to see something like this (or whatever the equivalent Perl 6 syntax
would be):
class PracticalJoke does Bomb does SomeThingElse {
method fuse() but overrides { ... }
}
The "overrides" tells Perl 6 that we're overriding the fuse() method
> from either Bomb or Som
Em Qua, 2009-07-08 às 12:49 -0700, Ovid escreveu:
> Behavioral: if you are primarily relying on roles to provide behavior
> (as we do at the BBC), then silently discarding the role's behavior by
> providing a method of the same name in your class can lead to very
> confusing bugs. I've lost a lot
- Original Message
> From: Jonathan Worthington
> Ovid wrote:
> > It needs the timed fuse() from a Bomb role and a non-lethal explode() from
> > a
> Spouse role, though each role provides both methods.
> I'm curious...
>
> 1) How often do you in real life find yourself needing to do
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> (Note to the bored: feel free to beat me to adding something like these last
> two to the spectests...I'm away for the afternoon/evening.)
In r27483, I added these tests to S12-methods/multi.t:
http://dev.pugscode.org/changeset/27483
Jonathan Worthington wrote in "YAPC::EU and Perl 6 Roles":
> More fitting to me would be an adverb to the does trait modifier...
>
> class C does R1 :without does R2 :without { ... }
>
> The thing is that in this case, does the class actually do R1 and R2? If you
> are going to derive an anonymous
Hi,
Going back to the original question...
Ovid wrote:
It needs the timed fuse() from a Bomb role and a non-lethal explode() from a
Spouse role, though each role provides both methods.
I'm curious...
1) How often do you in real life find yourself needing to do things like
this in real life?
Jon Lang wrote:
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Ovid wrote:
Though I have issues with Jonathan's approach (I don't like classes
silently discarding role methods as this has caused us many bugs at the
BBC), it's much cleaner that what I see here.
s/Jonathan's approach/Perl 6's approa
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Ovid wrote:
>> Though I have issues with Jonathan's approach (I don't like classes
>> silently discarding role methods as this has caused us many bugs at the
>> BBC), it's much cleaner that what I see here.
>
> s/Jonathan's approach/Perl 6's approach/ # at least, so fa
Ovid wrote:
- Original Message
From: Timothy S. Nelson
class PracticalJoke {
has Bomb $bomb handles ;
has Spouse $spouse handles ;
}
Note that I have no idea where (if anywhere) the type goes in this.
Hopefully someone will correct me here. Note that this does not us
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Ovid wrote:
Note that I have no idea where (if anywhere) the type goes in this.
Hopefully someone will correct me here. Note that this does not use the roles
as roles; it uses them punned as classes. But it does what you asked :).
Though I have issues with Jonathan'
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67324]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67324 >
rakudo: class A { method foo {"A.foo"} }; class C { has A $.a
handles *; }; my C $c .=
- Original Message
> From: Timothy S. Nelson
>
> class PracticalJoke {
> has Bomb $bomb handles ;
> has Spouse $spouse handles ;
> }
>
> Note that I have no idea where (if anywhere) the type goes in this.
> Hopefully someone will correct me here. Note that this does not us
24 matches
Mail list logo
