Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: a9f9c60e33f715895323db1465ba4da26d30730d
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/a9f9c60e33f715895323db1465ba4da26d30730d
Author: Larry Wall
Date: 2012-09-11 (Tue, 11 Sep 2012)
Changed paths:
M S17-con
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:11:11PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Nicholas (>):
> > Where in the synopses (or other documents) does it explain why these two
> > are different?
> >
> > $ ./perl6 -e 'sub foo {state @a = (3, 4); say ++@a[0];}; foo; foo;'
> > 4
> > 5
> > $ ./perl6 -e 'sub foo {(state @a) =
Nicholas (>):
> Where in the synopses (or other documents) does it explain why these two
> are different?
>
> $ ./perl6 -e 'sub foo {state @a = (3, 4); say ++@a[0];}; foo; foo;'
> 4
> 5
> $ ./perl6 -e 'sub foo {(state @a) = (3, 4); say ++@a[0];}; foo; foo;'
> 4
> 4
S03:4912. "Each declarator can t
Where in the synopses (or other documents) does it explain why these two
are different?
$ ./perl6 -e 'sub foo {state @a = (3, 4); say ++@a[0];}; foo; foo;'
4
5
$ ./perl6 -e 'sub foo {(state @a) = (3, 4); say ++@a[0];}; foo; foo;'
4
4
(I'm pretty sure that I remember that they intentionally *are*
# New Ticket Created by Alexander Hartmaier
# Please include the string: [perl #114836]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=114836 >
As just discussed in #perl6 code that I wrote with Rakudo 2011.01 stopped
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:38:43AM -0700, Carey Tilden wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> > I've tried to come up with some sort of stability rating for the specs,
> > and this is as far as I got: https://gist.github.com/2346494
>
> I like that a lot. Any chance such
