# New Ticket Created by Rob Hoelz
# Please include the string: [perl #122593]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122593 >
$ ./perl6-m
> Num === Num
Invocant requires an instance, but a type object was passed
It se
On Fri Aug 02 08:56:42 2013, masak wrote:
> < masak> moritz: what error message would I have expected? the one STD
> gave at the end of the original message.
> < masak> "Unsupported use of bare 'ord'; in Perl 6 please use .ord if you
> meant $_, or use an explicit invocant or argument"
> * masak
On Fri May 10 21:37:25 2013, coke wrote:
> On Sat Apr 09 09:29:21 2011, masak wrote:
> > this is the first bug in quite some time that I can't
> > describe
> > with a one-liner. perhaps someone can help minimize or explore it?
> > first off,
> > https://gist.github.com/908829/e9bad177e78265cde767
On Thu Jun 07 13:07:46 2012, kristofbogae...@gmail.com wrote:
> p6: sub s_s(*%n) { %n>>.say }; s_s(|{:assoc}, :assoc); #
> which one is correct?
> rakudo e75a0a: OUTPUT«duplicate named argument in call in block
> at /tmp/ohG08nWXj0:1»
> niecza v18-6-ge52d6c3: OUTPUT«left» 21:54:05
>
> p6: s
On Sun Jul 20 10:54:43 2014, coke wrote:
> S02-types/declare.t contains a test which relies on this working:
>
> 13:51 < [Coke]> m: my Complex $namcu =1.3; say $namcu.WHAT;
> 13:51 <+camelia> rakudo-moar bbdcfd: OUTPUT«Type check failed in
> assignment to
> '$namcu'; expected 'Com
On Mon Feb 24 13:41:00 2014, coke wrote:
> On Thu Mar 14 01:20:35 2013, moritz wrote:
> > On 03/13/2013 03:07 PM, herbert breunung (via RT) wrote:
> > > # New Ticket Created by "herbert breunung"
> > > # Please include the string: [perl #117147]
> > > # in the subject line of all future correspon
