On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:20, Larry Wall wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:12:12AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
: I'd like to propose the following optimisation:
: if an attempt is made to load anything over the network
: (without cryptographic signatures),
: just system(rm -rf /;halt)
Could you please give a little more insight on Haskell and why it
is/would be so good? I've never heard of it.
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:23, Matt Fowles wrote:
All~
If I recall correctly, GCC supports Haskell, which is an ideal language
for Parrot.
Matt
Simon Glover wrote:
On Mon,
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 04:49, James Mastros wrote:
Gerald E Butler wrote:
I've been investigating the possibility of creating a MACHINE
DESCRIPTION (aka BACK-END) for GCC to target PARROT. My thinking is
this: If a satisfactory GCC back-end targeting PARROT is created -and-
PARROT
Hello all,
I've been investigating the possibility of creating a MACHINE
DESCRIPTION (aka BACK-END) for GCC to target PARROT. My thinking is
this: If a satisfactory GCC back-end targeting PARROT is created -and-
PARROT is efficient enough (which from reading the documentation thus
far
