Karl Forner schrieb:
So in my opinion too this pmc should be rewritten. I'm ready to do it,
based
on my fixedbooleanarray implementation,
but before doing it I need some answers :
Yes, I've always why ResizableBooleanArray extends FixedBooleanArray and why
FixedBooleanArray is not simply a
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 01:49 schrieb Karl Forner:
Whare the requirements/constraints of a ResizableBooleanArray ? e.g are
unshift to be less frequent that shift ?
shift and unshift are both more unlikely than push/pop I presume. OTOH if a
user wants a bit queue, you have to deal with
Yes, I've always why ResizableBooleanArray extends FixedBooleanArray and
why
FixedBooleanArray is not simply a special case of ResizableBooleanArray.
Because a FixedBooleanArray is simpler, so that it may use less memory and
be implemented more efficiently I suppose.
Is there a real
On 10/5/06, Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 01:49 schrieb Karl Forner:
Whare the requirements/constraints of a ResizableBooleanArray ? e.g are
unshift to be less frequent that shift ?
shift and unshift are both more unlikely than push/pop I presume.
