On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:38, Matt Diephouse wrote:
The attached patch completely reworks Parrot_process_args. The changes
are extensive and I think they make the code much clearer. Rather than
just check it in, I thought I'd try to get feedback here to make sure
that it is clearer to
chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:38, Matt Diephouse wrote:
The attached patch completely reworks Parrot_process_args. The changes
are extensive and I think they make the code much clearer. Rather than
just check it in, I thought I'd try to get feedback here to
On Monday 23 April 2007 17:10, Matt Diephouse wrote:
It's three lines; is it worth extracting somehow?
It could definitely be placed inside start_flatten(), but that would
make the code a little misleading, I think. I'm not sure it's worth
placing it in a function of its own; the
The attached patch completely reworks Parrot_process_args. The changes
are extensive and I think they make the code much clearer. Rather than
just check it in, I thought I'd try to get feedback here to make sure
that it is clearer to everyone else and not just to myself.
This patch also fixes a
From: Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:38:11 -0400
The attached patch completely reworks Parrot_process_args. The changes
are extensive and I think they make the code much clearer. Rather than
just check it in, I thought I'd try to get feedback here to
