Kenneth Graves wrote:
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ optimized register allocation ]
Is there a stub of this functionality in the code somewhere?
(Or some notes about how it might be approached?)
No, not yet. Currently local variables (and parameters if a sub calls
another sub)
Kenneth A Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The .pcc_* directives are working for me in terms of implementing
function calls. I want to do something similar for iterator calls.
I've decided to implement iterators using coroutines.
I have applied it. The test program foo.pir is now a test in
Kenneth A Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inside the iterator, there are three differences compared to a function:
1) Every register in use needs to be saved to the user stack. (Anyone
have a clean way to do this?)
Its the same thing as calling a subroutine in the first place. Imcc has
to
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 14:50:05 +0200
Kenneth A Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inside the iterator, there are three differences compared to a function:
1) Every register in use needs to be saved to the user stack. (Anyone
have a clean
# New Ticket Created by Kenneth A Graves
# Please include the string: [perl #23186]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23186
The .pcc_* directives are working for me in terms of implementing
function
Kenneth A Graves (via RT) wrote:
The .pcc_* directives are working for me in terms of implementing
function calls. I want to do something similar for iterator calls.
I've decided to implement iterators using coroutines.
Seems very well done and clean to me. Albeit further comments of
lanugage
