Done as of r27113.
Pm
I've applied the patch from RT#52838 which updates the documentation.
I'm now working on eliminating the restoreall/saveall opcodes themselves
from Parrot, as well as working on the related user stack ops in RT#52842.
Pm
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:36 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30:50 Bob Rogers wrote:
>
> >From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:01 -0700
> >
> >But here is a patch which partially implements the object
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:36:38 -0700
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30:50 Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:01 -0700
>
>Still to be addressed is this portion of the OP:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30:50 Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:01 -0700
>
>But here is a patch which partially implements the objective of this RT.
>
> Excellent; thank you. Did you want to apply it, or shall I?
>
>
From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:01 -0700
But here is a patch which partially implements the objective of this RT.
Excellent; thank you. Did you want to apply it, or shall I?
What's missing is a revision of docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod.
On Sun Apr 13 08:35:08 2008, rgrjr wrote:
>
>The usages in ncidef2pasm.pl appear to have nothing per se to do with
>these ops . . .
>
> I couldn't even figure out what ncidef2pasm.pl was for, let alone how to
> test it. Is this dead code?
>
Not quite. This is one of a number of scrip
From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:59:42 -0500
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:34:33AM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:28:17 -0700
>
>Of these five files, the onl
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:34:33AM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:28:17 -0700
>
>Of these five files, the only ones that we (or, more to the point, I)
>could not safely do right away is languages/BASIC/compiler/c
From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:28:17 -0700
On Sat Apr 12 20:20:30 2008, rgrjr wrote:
> There are only a few uses/references left in the
> codebase:
>
>/usr/src/parrot/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod
>/usr/src/parrot/docs/
On Sat Apr 12 20:20:30 2008, rgrjr wrote:
> There are only a few uses/references left in the
> codebase:
>
> /usr/src/parrot/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod
> /usr/src/parrot/docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod
> /usr/src/parrot/editor/kate_syntax.pl
> /usr/src/parrot/languages/
# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers
# Please include the string: [perl #52838]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52838 >
These are holdovers from the bad old days of limited registers. In
the rare case where
12 matches
Mail list logo
