[perl #58948] [BUG] multi subs compile but cause segfault

2009-05-01 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Wed Sep 17 08:35:08 2008, pmichaud wrote: Actually, I suspect the problem may be that 'max' is already a builtin function in Perl, and that the conflict comes because the builtins (written in PIR) are still using Parrot's MultiSub while the ones written in Perl 6 are using the new

[perl #58948] [BUG] multi subs compile but cause segfault

2008-09-17 Thread Stephen Simmons
# New Ticket Created by Stephen Simmons # Please include the string: [perl #58948] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58948 Using the more elaborate version of the testcase behind #58294, which has a two

Re: [perl #58948] [BUG] multi subs compile but cause segfault

2008-09-17 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:01:06PM -0700, Stephen Simmons wrote: Using the more elaborate version of the testcase behind #58294, which has a two and a three argument version of max, what use to compile and execute incorrectly before the bug fix now compiles and segfaults. I suspect this has

Re: [perl #58948] [BUG] multi subs compile but cause segfault

2008-09-17 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:01:12AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:01:06PM -0700, Stephen Simmons wrote: Using the more elaborate version of the testcase behind #58294, which has a two and a three argument version of max, what use to compile and execute