Bob Rogers wrote:
Allison Randal wrote:
+Monkeypatching is certainly possible, but not encouraged.
Cool; a new term in Allison-speak! ;-}
As much as linguists love creating new words, I can't claim credit for
this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patch
More later,
Allison
From: Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:31:18 +0200
Bob Rogers wrote:
Allison Randal wrote:
+Monkeypatching is certainly possible, but not encouraged.
Cool; a new term in Allison-speak! ;-}
As much as linguists love creating new
Bob Rogers wrote:
+{{ There seems to be an implied basic assumption here that language
+interoperability is the responsibility of the language
+implementor. It is not. We cannot require that language
+implementors design and implement their languages according to some
+global
From: Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:15:18 +0200
Thank you for responding so promptly; I doubt I will be able to return
fire on your schedule.
Bob Rogers wrote:
As a case in point, consider keyword (named) parameters in Lisp.
Kea-CL does not use
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Author: allison
Date: Thu Aug 28 12:43:19 2008
New Revision: 30622
I've not responded to all your comments, just some of the key ones that
I hope will promote understanding. I won't commit any changes until
after
Author: allison
Date: Thu Aug 28 12:43:19 2008
New Revision: 30622
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd31_hll_interop.pod
Log:
[pdd] Adding a series of architectural comments to the HLL Interop PDD.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd31_hll_interop.pod
