在 2006/8/11 下午 3:00 時，Luke Palmer 寫到：
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some object types can behave as value types. Every object can
produce
a "safe key identifier" (C for short) that uniquely
identifies the
-object for hashing and other value-base comparisons.
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+To return from other types of code structures, the C function
+is used. The first argument, if supplied, specifies a C
+for the control structure to leave. The C and will be
+smart-matched against the dynamic scope objects from inner to
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some object types can behave as value types. Every object can produce
a "safe key identifier" (C for short) that uniquely identifies the
-object for hashing and other value-base comparisons. Normal objects
+object for hashing and other
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:17:59PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:21:31PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: > At 5:11 PM -0700 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > >Log:
: > >First whack at defining semantics of MAIN subs.
: >
: > Congradulations! That is SUCH a great
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:21:31PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> At 5:11 PM -0700 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Log:
> >First whack at defining semantics of MAIN subs.
>
> Congradulations! That is SUCH a great idea.
I agree! No more caller() tricks to see if we're being required or
not b
At 5:11 PM -0700 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
First whack at defining semantics of MAIN subs.
Congradulations! That is SUCH a great idea.
Since Perl didn't have the concept of an explicit 'main' before like
many other languages, I had been doing this for a long while in my
non-tin
Author: larry
Date: Thu Aug 10 17:11:54 2006
New Revision: 10804
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
First whack at defining semantics of MAIN subs.
Typo from Aaron Crane++.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
===
