Re: [perl #125627] "42 xx Inf" does not create an infinite list

2015-07-16 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125627 > > > > Code: > say 5 xx Inf; > > Result: > This type cannot unbox to a native integer > in block at ./test.pl:2 > > > I expected an infinite list to be created. > > 22:09:08 AlexDaniel: …

[perl #125627] "42 xx Inf" does not create an infinite list

2015-07-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Alex Jakimenko # Please include the string: [perl #125627] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125627 > Code: say 5 xx Inf; Result: This type cannot unbox to a native integer in block

Re: xx Inf

2004-12-10 Thread Michele Dondi
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Larry Wall wrote: On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:11:30AM +0100, Juerd wrote: : What happens to the flip flop operator? Will .. in scalar context remain : the same? I don't think so. It's definitely a candidate for a longer Huffmanization simply in terms of frequency of use. On top

Re: xx Inf

2004-12-03 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 05:37:54PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: : Juerd writes: : > What happens to the flip flop operator? Will .. in scalar context : > remain the same? What comes in place of ...? (An adverb?) : : The scalar range operator was always a weird one for me, but that isn't : to say that

Re: xx Inf

2004-12-03 Thread Jon Ericson
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Juerd writes: >> What happens to the flip flop operator? Will .. in scalar context >> remain the same? What comes in place of ...? (An adverb?) > Anyway, to answer what I _do_ know, isn't .. exactly the same as ... in > Perl 5? That was my impression, at

Re: xx Inf

2004-12-03 Thread Larry Wall
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:11:30AM +0100, Juerd wrote: : What happens to the flip flop operator? Will .. in scalar context remain : the same? I don't think so. It's definitely a candidate for a longer Huffmanization simply in terms of frequency of use. On top of which, almost no Perl 5 programme

Re: xx Inf

2004-12-03 Thread Luke Palmer
Juerd writes: > What happens to the flip flop operator? Will .. in scalar context > remain the same? What comes in place of ...? (An adverb?) The scalar range operator was always a weird one for me, but that isn't to say that it hasn't been put to good use by wizards. I wouldn't be surprised if i

xx Inf

2004-12-03 Thread Juerd
What happens to the flip flop operator? Will .. in scalar context remain the same? What comes in place of ...? (An adverb?) Juerd