At 11:10 PM 1/3/2002 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
The other obvious answer is that we don't, because it's just to difficult,
if not impossible, to do, and do well. So is it worth the effort to pursue?
FWIW, I've heard of at least one product out there that does this, though
at the machine
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:10:56PM -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
On Thursday 03 January 2002 08:40 pm, Paul Baranowski wrote:
Hi -
I love what you guys are doing with Parrot. I was just recently
wondering if it would be possible to transform a program compiled down
to machine language
On Friday 04 January 2002 11:20 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:10 PM 1/3/2002 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
The other obvious answer is that we don't, because it's just to
difficult, if not impossible, to do, and do well. So is it worth the
effort to pursue?
FWIW, I've heard of at least
At 06:45 PM 1/4/2002 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2002 11:20 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:10 PM 1/3/2002 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
The other obvious answer is that we don't, because it's just to
difficult, if not impossible, to do, and do well. So is it worth
Hi -
I love what you guys are doing with Parrot. I was just recently
wondering if it would be possible to transform a program compiled down
to machine language into byte-code, thereby automatically porting any
app to any other machine (at least any statically-compiled app). Does
anyone see any
On Thursday 03 January 2002 08:40 pm, Paul Baranowski wrote:
Hi -
I love what you guys are doing with Parrot. I was just recently
wondering if it would be possible to transform a program compiled down
to machine language into byte-code, thereby automatically porting any
app to any other