I just found http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Strict,
which was written by one of my co-workers. Among
other cool things, it has a C function
which does the same thing. It still uses backticks
and redirection which may not be too portable, but it
will suit my needs. Still, a C function
seems lik
Moin,
On Thursday 16 March 2006 03:49, chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:43, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as
> > compile_ok(), rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as
> > it seems to closely parallel use_ok() for
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:43, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as compile_ok(),
> rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as it seems to closely
> parallel use_ok() for modules and would be rather useful on a larger scale.
That woul
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as compile_ok(),
> rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as it seems to closely
> parallel use_ok() for modules and would be rather useful on a larger scale.
I agree, a well
>>> I've long intended to take t/test.pl from the Perl core distribution
>>> and wrap
>>> up at least its runperl() in a Test:: module. Perhaps that would
>>> work for
>>> you?
>>
>>
>> compile_ok() ?
>>
>> --Geoff
>>
>
> It is unclear from Geoff's message above whether he is asserting that
>
http://search.cpan.org/src/ADAMK/ThreatNet-Bot-AmmoBot-0.10/t/01_compile.t
That function should probably be changed to use FindBin instead of
updir() calls.
Actually, by modern standards I'd consider that a pretty half-assed.
Mostly for the fact it's a highly unix usage.
If it was doing it
On Mar 15, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
instead of using backticks and output redirection.
But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
around on CPA
Moin,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 21:29, chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
> > I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
> > instead of using backticks and output redirection.
> > But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
> > around on C
chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
>
>
>>I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
>>instead of using backticks and output redirection.
>>But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
>>around on CPAN, but I have not yet found a Test::
>>
Putting aside the argument that most logic should be
in libraries and not scripts, what is the best
practice for writing test cases to verify that your
Perl scripts compile? My quick and dirty solution is
something like:
use Test::More tests => 1;
chomp (my $output = `perl -c $script 2>&1`);
i
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
> I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
> instead of using backticks and output redirection.
> But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
> around on CPAN, but I have not yet found a Test::
> module that seems appropri
11 matches
Mail list logo
