-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/10 22:03 , Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jon Murray wrote:
>
>> My understanding from synopses was that you get the Perl 5 behaviour if
>> you omit the signature on your function declaration (though I
>> unfortunatel
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jon Murray wrote:
> My understanding from synopses was that you get the Perl 5 behaviour if
> you omit the signature on your function declaration (though I
> unfortunately can't check as I don't have Rakudo installed):
>
> sub foo { @_[0] = 1 }
> my $a = 0;
> foo(
My understanding from synopses was that you get the Perl 5 behaviour if
you omit the signature on your function declaration (though I
unfortunately can't check as I don't have Rakudo installed):
sub foo { @_[0] = 1 }
my $a = 0;
foo($a);
say $a; # 0
Cheers...
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:06 -0400, Aa
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jonathan Worthington
wrote:
>
>>
> I saw a video camera in the room, but not sure when we'll be seeing the
> footage from that. In the meantime, the slides are at:
>
> http://www.jnthn.net/papers/2010-yapc-eu-signatures.pdf
>
>
Nice talk! One minor nit, and perhap
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:38:31PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
In fact, jnthn++ had a talk at YAPC::EU the other week where he showed
how nested signatures can be used to make hierarchical matches. A
proof-of-concept module could simply be some sugar around this already
ex
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:38:31PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> In fact, jnthn++ had a talk at YAPC::EU the other week where he showed
> how nested signatures can be used to make hierarchical matches. A
> proof-of-concept module could simply be some sugar around this already
> existing functionality
Carl (>>), Aaron (>):
>> * Grammars define a hierarchical structure that seems to be perfect
>> for encoding the packing of larger pieces of data, for example when
>> serializing an object structure. Could one use grammars, or something
>> very much like it, as a "modern" &pack template?
>
> A whil
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Oha (>):
>
>
> * Grammars define a hierarchical structure that seems to be perfect
> for encoding the packing of larger pieces of data, for example when
> serializing an object structure. Could one use grammars, or something
> very much like it
Oha (>):
> after speaking with masak, i come up with some ideas about Buf
> i would like to share with you, maybe you can find them usefull
>
> http://register.oha.it/buf.pod
Just thought I'd weigh in here a bit. Oha's proposal consists of two
parts, each of which is interesting in its own right:
after speaking with masak, i come up with some ideas about Buf
i would like to share with you, maybe you can find them usefull
http://register.oha.it/buf.pod
HTH
Oha
10 matches
Mail list logo
