Qui, 2008-06-05 às 15:43 -0700, Larry Wall escreveu:
> Maybe it's just a temporary lack of imagination, but I'm having trouble
> these days coming up with any kind of a use case for confusing single
> dispatch with multiple dispatch. Yeah, I know I wrote that, but I was
> either smarter or stupide
On 2008 Jun 5, at 18:43, Larry Wall wrote:
Maybe it's just a temporary lack of imagination, but I'm having
trouble
these days coming up with any kind of a use case for confusing single
dispatch with multiple dispatch. Yeah, I know I wrote that, but I was
either smarter or stupider back then.
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:04:52AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: This message is looking for a clarification/confirmation.
: S12:207 says:
:
: > To call an ordinary method with ordinary method-dispatch semantics,
: > use either the dot notation or indirect object notation:
: >
: > $obj
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:45:08PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> > Okay, so my bad example didn't provide an answer to my
> > original question. Let's try it this way:
> >
> > class Foo {
> > multi method bar(Dog $x) { say "Foo::bar"; }
> > }
> > sub bar(Int $x) { say "sub bar";
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 05:29:25PM +0100, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>> Qui, 2008-06-05 às 11:04 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud escreveu:
>> > Does fall back to a subroutine occur anytime we don't have
>> > a method with a matching signature? For example, if we have
>>
>> as far a
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 05:29:25PM +0100, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Qui, 2008-06-05 às 11:04 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud escreveu:
> > Does fall back to a subroutine occur anytime we don't have
> > a method with a matching signature? For example, if we have
>
> as far as I understand it, it only falls
Qui, 2008-06-05 às 11:04 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud escreveu:
> Does fall back to a subroutine occur anytime we don't have
> a method with a matching signature? For example, if we have
as far as I understand it, it only falls back to sub-dispach if the
method dispatch would otherwise fail, which b
This message is looking for a clarification/confirmation.
S12:207 says:
> To call an ordinary method with ordinary method-dispatch semantics,
> use either the dot notation or indirect object notation:
>
> $obj.doit(1,2,3)
> doit $obj: 1,2,3
>
> If the method was not found, it will fall
