# New Ticket Created by Jens Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #31601]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31601
I've added t/library/streams.t
Test #13 and #19 are marked as TODO because they
# New Ticket Created by Jens Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #31601]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31601
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.4
arch= i586-linux-thread-multi
cc= cc
---
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 6:40 PM +0200 9/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ register backing stacks ]
The register spilling code could easily use them
See 1) below
That makes the interpreter unbearable slow and non-competitive. That's
the reason for my alternate calling scheme proposal.
Then we put
At 6:40 PM +0200 9/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:41 PM +0200 9/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
No. As layed out my scheme doesn't need any register backing stacks.
If you're cloning the context every time someone pushes a register
frame... that's a bit excessive.
There are
Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
the examples in examples/streams are not working with --gc-debug,
FileLines.imc crashes even without it.
Any idea why?
Nasty. After spending some hours with gdb and thinking up, down, and in
circles, I could eventually boil it down to the code below.
The continuation
At 2:10 PM +0200 9/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
the examples in examples/streams are not working with --gc-debug,
FileLines.imc crashes even without it.
Any idea why?
Nasty. After spending some hours with gdb and thinking up, down, and
in circles, I could eventually boil it
Dan Sugalski wrote:
There are two simple answers here (the proposal for the change in the
way interpreter context structs are handled isn't it -- we'll have the
same problem because we'll still have backing stacks).
No. As layed out my scheme doesn't need any register backing stacks.
... Either
At 4:41 PM +0200 9/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
There are two simple answers here (the proposal for the change in
the way interpreter context structs are handled isn't it -- we'll
have the same problem because we'll still have backing stacks).
No. As layed out my scheme
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:41 PM +0200 9/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
No. As layed out my scheme doesn't need any register backing stacks.
If you're cloning the context every time someone pushes a register
frame... that's a bit excessive.
There are no register stacks, no register stack opcodes,
Hi,
the examples in examples/streams are not working with --gc-debug,
FileLines.imc crashes even without it.
Any idea why?
jens
10 matches
Mail list logo
