At 3:34 PM -0400 5/20/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
At 12:06 AM -0400 5/19/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put
back
onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all
pmc's
before moving anything to the freelist, in case
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:34:27PM -0400, Mike Lambert wrote:
Collect's dead, I think. I'm not seeing the point anymore, and since
we do collect runs through the buffers and not the PMCs, there's no
place to find what needs calling.
Well, the hashtable could certainly use it. :) There is
At 12:06 AM -0400 5/19/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put back
onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all pmc's
before moving anything to the freelist, in case of dependancies between
pmcs and buffers)
Nope. I don't
At 12:06 AM -0400 5/19/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put
back
onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all
pmc's
before moving anything to the freelist, in case of dependancies between
pmcs and buffers)
Nope. I
So we're going to support some vtable operations for GC support.
We currently have mark, and we're going to have collect.
Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put back
onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all pmc's
before moving anything to