Aaron Sherman writes:
: On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 21:38, root wrote:
: >
: > I've always liked how VB allowed you to define "instance methods."
: > Basically a more elegant way of doing callbacks, plus allows some
: > structure within your callbacks. Will Perl6 allow this (Perl5 sortof did,
: > bu
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:38:12PM -0600, root wrote:
> #BTW, is there some standard way of creating instances
> #now?
Class::Classless and Class::Prototyped off the top of my head.
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 21:38, root wrote:
>
> I've always liked how VB allowed you to define "instance methods."
> Basically a more elegant way of doing callbacks, plus allows some
> structure within your callbacks. Will Perl6 allow this (Perl5 sortof did,
> but since the "bless" way of doing t
I've always liked how VB allowed you to define "instance methods."
Basically a more elegant way of doing callbacks, plus allows some
structure within your callbacks. Will Perl6 allow this (Perl5 sortof did,
but since the "bless" way of doing things is going away...)
Perhaps...
class foo {..
to it? The latter would occur with the
Perl5 solution above, and I would argue that it should stay that way,
since it's not exactly the same type.
Mike Lambert
Luke Palmer wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 19:51:39 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EM
It seems something messed up while I tried to send this earlier. If this
is essentially a duplicate, ignore it.
I've always liked how VB allowed you to do "instance methods." They allow
for more elegant callbacks, and more structure if callbacks are
complicated. Will Perl6 allow this? (Perl5 s
