# New Ticket Created by "Kyle Hasselbacher"
# Please include the string: [perl #61930]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61930 >
I don't know why '1 < 2' would work but '2 < 1' would not work, but
this tests fo
Rejected, as we're deleting the file proposed for expansion.
Rejected, as we're deleting the file proposed for expansion.
Rejected, as we're deleting the file proposed for expansion.
Rejected, as we're deleting the file proposed for expansion.
Rejected, as we're deleting the file proposed for expansion.
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #55768]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55768 >
Attached patch adds three more test files (list builtins).
The last two tests in joint.
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #55772]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55772 >
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attached patch
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attached patch adds three more test files (list builtins).
>
> The last two tests in joint. are likely to be wrong, and are fudged as
> such. Further clarification is welcome.
>
> More on that in a separate mail.
>
thanks,
Attached patch adds three more test files (list builtins).
The last two tests in joint. are likely to be wrong, and are fudged as
such. Further clarification is welcome.
More on that in a separate mail.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Index: t/spec
On Sat Jun 07 07:13:07 2008, ronaldxs wrote:
Probably I don't understand correctly your question. This is output from
my version of patched rakudo:
$ ../../parrot perl6.pbc
> eval 'my $x = 2; $x = $x / 0; say $x;'; say 'eval exception ', $!;
eval exception Divide by zero
Is it what you want?
-
On 2008 Jun 6, at 23:53, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
jerry gay wrote:
would you reformat this in universal diff format please? my patch
program doesn't speak git.
Strange... It is 'universal diff' format. Can be applied with
'patch -p1 < eval.diff' in top-level parrot directory. Or with
'patch -
Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
This is wrong patch. eval() shouldn't throws any exceptions.
Correct patch for 'eval()' and Test.pm attached.
As Mr Lenz wrote with respect to eval exceptions and this patch:
Are there any exceptions that are not caught by eval?
Currently rakudo seems to catch every
On Fri Jun 06 20:11:36 2008, particle wrote:
(Sorry for spam if any. Looks like my message was rejected by mailman.)
eval() shouldn't throws any exceptions.
Correct patch for 'eval()' and Test.pm attached.
--
Bacek.
===
--- Test.pm (orig)
+++ Te
jerry gay wrote:
would you reformat this in universal diff format please? my patch
program doesn't speak git.
Strange... It is 'universal diff' format. Can be applied with
'patch -p1 < eval.diff' in top-level parrot directory. Or with
'patch -p3 < eval.diff' in languages/perl6.
Anyway, attache
jerry gay wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
thanks, applied as of r28074.
~jerry
This is wrong patch. eval() shouldn't throws any exceptions.
Correct patch for 'eval()' and Test.pm attached.
-
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Vasily Chekalkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
>>>
>> thanks, applied as of r28074.
>> ~jerry
>
> This is wron
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ronald Schmidt wrote:
>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>> Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
>>>
>>>
>> Your implementations of eval_lives_ok and eval_dies_ok seem
>> inconsistent. eval_lives_ok uses try and eval_dies
Ronald Schmidt wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
>>
>>
> Your implementations of eval_lives_ok and eval_dies_ok seem
> inconsistent. eval_lives_ok uses try and eval_dies_ok does not. The
> two implementations may catch different types of exce
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
Your implementations of eval_lives_ok and eval_dies_ok seem
inconsistent. eval_lives_ok uses try and eval_dies_ok does not. The
two implementations may catch different types of exceptions. I am
proposing the patch b
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #55304]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55304 >
Attached patch, mostly courtesy Vasily "bacek" Chekalkin, adds the
eval_lives_ok and eval
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
>
thanks, applied as of r28074.
~jerry
Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Index: languages/perl6/t/spectest_regression.data
===
--- languages/perl6/t/spectest_regression.data (revision 28065)
Attached patch, mostly courtesy Vasily "bacek" Chekalkin, adds the
eval_lives_ok and eval_dies_ok methods to Test.pm, and adds three more
passing tests to 'make spectest_regression'.
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Attached patch adds a few more passing tests to 'make
spectest_regression'. bacek++ for fudging some of them, and pmichaud++
for implementing much of it!
I didn't add S29-list/map.t to the list which also passes (fudged), but
has this block at its end:
#
# Map with mutating block
#
# Dubious: A
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #46797]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46797 >
In t/tools/smartlinks.t there is the todo item:
# TODO: SmartLinkServer
Which means:
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #46795]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46795 >
In t/tools/smartlinks.t there is the todo item:
# TODO: TestInfo
Which means: test th
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #46793]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46793 >
In t/tools/smartlinks.t there is the todo item:
# TODO: Test
Which means: test the C
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #46791]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46791 >
In t/tools/smartlinks.t in the context of the C class there is
the todo item:
# TODO:
ODO: many more ->files tests
Which means to say; add many more tests of the C method of this
class.
# New Ticket Created by Kay-Uwe Huell
# Please include the string: [perl #40106]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40106 >
Hi parrot-team,
fixed a few things in PGE::P5Regex and t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.t
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #39979]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39979 >
The following aspects of [expr] still need tests:
- Unary operators with string
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #38028]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38028 >
Most are trivial, few are important.
Cheers
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departame
Tanton Gibbs wrote
radii.t
This isn't your fault, but I have to say that 0o0777 looks really bad in my
font...i.e.
looks like 000777. Perhaps the powers that be may eliminate octal (who uses
it?)
or change it to c? t? or l?
Hmmm, maybe, but 0o00 would be so great in halloween-based JAPHs ;)
h that
print "&(noret)"
should be
print "$(noret)";
Is this correct?
Anyway, it looks good...keep up the good work.
Tanton
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph F. Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 20
I've added a slew of new tests to the p6-literals test-suite, including:
- Error tests.
- Bit-type.
- Subscripted variable interpolation.
- Variable method interpolation.
- Many conversion tests.
I was a bit unsure (read: possibly rong as wrabbits) on some of the error
and conversion tests, so le
Applied, thanks.
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #15680]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=15680 >
The patches below add tests for:
* jsr
* bor_i_i, bxor_i_i and band_i_i
* no
We need more tests.
According to..
http://www.hitchhiker.org/parrot_coverage/
only 33% of the lines are covered!
if something breaks in the other 67%, we'll never know, unless we have
tests.
-R
--
At 23:25 on 05/31/2002 -, Simon Glover (via RT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch adds tests for the index, depth & intdepth ops, as well
> as adding an extra test for intsave/intrestore.
>
> Simon
Committed, daddio.
--Josh
e Parrot::Test tests => 32;
use Test::More;
# Tests for stack operations, currently push*, push_*_c and pop*
@@ -589,6 +589,32 @@
OUTPUT
}
+output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "depth op");
+depth I0
+print I0
+print &quo
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:18:17PM +, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> The enclosed patch fixes a few of the holes in our test coverage
> uncovered by Josh Wilmes
Thanks, applied.
Nicholas Clark
--
Even better than the real thing:http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/
The enclosed patch fixes a few of the holes in our test coverage
uncovered by Josh Wilmes
Simon
--- t/op/integer.t.old Sat Mar 9 15:38:21 2002
+++ t/op/integer.t Sat Mar 9 15:55:33 2002
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#! perl -w
-use Parrot::Test tests => 30;
+use Parrot::Test tests => 32;
o
At 12:02 PM 12/15/2001 -1000, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
>This patch adds tests for all the bitwise opcodes.
Applied, thanks.
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
This patch adds tests for all the bitwise opcodes.
David
*** bitwise.t 26 Sep 2001 05:55:32 - 1.2
--- bitwise.t 15 Dec 2001 21:53:18 -
***
*** 1,6
#! perl -w
! use Parrot::Test tests => 4;
output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "shr_i_ic (>>)");
set I0, 0b001100
--
At 05:01 PM 12/14/2001 +, Simon Glover wrote:
> This patch contains some more tests for the pow and atan families of
> opcodes; it should cover all the different possible combinations of
> n, i, nc and nc.
Applied, thanks.
This patch contains some more tests for the pow and atan families of
opcodes; it should cover all the different possible combinations of
n, i, nc and nc.
Simon Glover
--- trans.old Sun Dec 2 20:00:01 2001
+++ trans.t Fri Dec 14 16:47:13 2001
@@ -288,37 +288,114 @@
ok 2
OUTPUT
47 matches
Mail list logo
