In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Mastros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. Unfornatly, after starting on this, I relized that that's the easy
part. Unicode has a fairly-well defined way of figuring out if a character
is a digit (see if it's category is Nd (Number/digit), and if so
On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 00:16:34 GMT, Tom Hughes wrote:
So far I have added as is_digit() call to the character type layer
to replace the existing isdigit() calls.
There seems to be an overlap with the /\d/ character class in regexes.
Can't you use the same test? Can't you use the definition of
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 02:17:31AM +, Alex Gough wrote:
Also, for string - integer conversion I think we ought to be scanning
for a float then turning the result into an integer (as 1234.56e2 is
one).
Does scanning for a float include 1234,56e2 or any other locale specific
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Mastros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Tom Hughes wrote:
It's completely wrong I would have thought - the encoding layer
cannot know that a given code point is a digit so it can't possibly
do string to number conversion.
You
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Tom Hughes wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Mastros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Tom Hughes wrote:
It's completely wrong I would have thought - the encoding layer
cannot know that a given code point is a digit so it can't possibly
The string to number conversion stuff should really be done by the
string encodings... I think this is the right way to get this
happening, comments?
Alex Gough
Index: string.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/string.c,v
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 05:42:15PM +, Alex Gough wrote:
The string to number conversion stuff should really be done by the
string encodings... I think this is the right way to get this
happening, comments?
Looks like the right way to me. Could you commit it?
I suppose this is the time to
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 05:42:15PM +, Alex Gough wrote:
The string to number conversion stuff should really be done by the
string encodings... I think this is the right way to get this
happening, comments?
Looks like the right way to me. Could
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 05:42:15PM +, Alex Gough wrote:
The string to number conversion stuff should really be done by the
string encodings... I think this is the right way to get this
happening, comments?
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Tom Hughes wrote:
It's completely wrong I would have thought - the encoding layer
cannot know that a given code point is a digit so it can't possibly
do string to number conversion.
You need to use the encoding layer to fetch each character and
then the character set
10 matches
Mail list logo
