On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:01:42PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:25:39PM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
I will rewrite some parts once I (or someone) gets out a bug in the hashes
(I created a hash with 722 key/value pairs and ~360 got lost)
I'll fix that bug as
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Anyone care to take this task on? It doesn't have to be at all fancy.
In fact, all it needs to do is handle:
*) Label offset calcs
*) Explicit, fully-qualified, opcode names
*) Opcode args as either labels or numbers
So we'd only pass it:
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:25:39PM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Anyone care to take this task on? It doesn't have to be at all fancy.
In fact, all it needs to do is handle:
*) Label offset calcs
*) Explicit, fully-qualified, opcode
Anyone care to take this task on? It doesn't have to be at all fancy.
In fact, all it needs to do is handle:
*) Label offset calcs
*) Explicit, fully-qualified, opcode names
*) Opcode args as either labels or numbers
So we'd only pass it:
foo: sub_i_i_ic 1, 2, 5
