Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
I assume that the Hash PMC should also be used by PIR code in
'runtime/parrot/library'. In that case returning PMCNULL is not nice, as
the returned PMC can't even be queried for it's type.
So for now a None PMC is returned for non-existent keys.
However this is no
Sam Ruby wrote:
Any objections to the NCI methods being removed from Coroutine(next),
Hash(fromkeys), Iterator(next), and PerlHash(fromkeys) now?
The fromkeys in Hash and PerlHash can be removed. The .next methods in
iterable PMCs will be needed generally. But iterators need some rework
still, e
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
The attached patch makes the Hash PMC use basic PMCs by default. Native
integers, numbers and strings are now stored as Integer, Float and
String PMCs. For keys without values, the Undef PMC is returned, as it
is laid out in pdd17.
As already mentioned: the Hash
> > The attached patch makes the Hash PMC use basic PMCs by default.
Sorry again,
one shouldn't send any patches after midnight.
First I forgot to clean up cruft from hash_pmc_20041218.patch. Then,
trying to send the corrected patch, I misspelled the name of the mailing
list.
So, please note th
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- The NCI method has an implementation in Hash and in PerlHash, this is
not nice
The NCI method is automatically inherited from Hash. But as it's a
python method it'll be removed from Hash anyway.
Any objections to the NCI methods being removed from Coroutine(next),
Hash(fro
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> The PerlHash is now an extension of Hash.
Great, thanks.
> The semantics should not have changed. For example, integer values are
> still stored as PerlInt PMCs in the Hash PMC.
I'd propose the following:
* instead of PerlInt an Integer PM
Hi,
I have responded to the ticket,
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=31859, but the response hasn't made
if to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a policy, which responses to RT tickets are posted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I know that it works fine for new tickets.
A patch for moving the implementation o
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #31859]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31859 >
Original Message
Subject: Re: Plain ole Hash
Date: Mon, 04
At 9:56 AM -0400 10/2/04, William Coleda wrote:
Are there any plans to make a Hash (as oppposed to a PerlHash, or an
OrderedHash (which is really a PerlHash) ?
D'oh! Knew there was something that was getting forgotten.
Yes, there should be plans. If someone wants to throw a basic
Hash.pmc list-wa
Are there any plans to make a Hash (as oppposed to a PerlHash, or an OrderedHash (which is really a PerlHash) ?
10 matches
Mail list logo
