On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:12:42AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 04:26:45AM -0500, João Cruz Morais wrote:
> > - Can I use PGE skipping TGE?
>
> I don't see why not. If you look at the bottom of grammar_rules.pg,
> you'll see this:
>
> token syntax_error { }
>
> wh
I'm no expert, but I'll hazard some answers:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 04:26:45AM -0500, João Cruz Morais wrote:
> I'm new to Parrot but reading from your slides if I understood correctly:
> - PGE parses input according to a grammar and produces a derivation tree.
> - TGE transforms the parse tree
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 02:26, João Cruz Morais wrote:
> With that said I have some questions (i'm sorry if they were answered
> already somewhere):
> - Whats the point of using PGE+TGE over the good old LEX+YACC besides the
> better regexps?
Transforming trees with real objects is a lot easier
Hi there!
I'm new to Parrot but reading from your slides if I understood correctly:
- PGE parses input according to a grammar and produces a derivation tree.
- TGE transforms the parse tree into an abstract syntax tree.
With that said I have some questions (i'm sorry if they were answered
alread
在 2006/6/27 下午 4:41 時，Patrick R. Michaud 寫到：
For any who may be interested, my talk slides for
"Perl 6 Compiler Status and the Parrot Compiler Toolkit"
(presented today at YAPC::NA) are available at
http://www.pmichaud.com/2006/pres/yapc-perl6/slide.html
That was a wonderful talk. Thank
For any who may be interested, my talk slides for
"Perl 6 Compiler Status and the Parrot Compiler Toolkit"
(presented today at YAPC::NA) are available at
http://www.pmichaud.com/2006/pres/yapc-perl6/slide.html
The slides for my second talk "Parser, Perl 6 Rules, and
the Parrot Grammar Engine
