At 06:59 AM 8/26/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
[I know this is not your quote, but your quotee's quote]
There is obviously no need to modify the behavior of the C operator.
Is one wholly certain of this?
DB1 @c = (1..3)
DB2 @a = @b @c
DB3 x @a
0 0
DB4 x
Tom Christiansen writes:
: It would appear that altering /|| on LHS context would entail,
: in the list assignment scenario, calling that operand in list context
: and then deciding whether it were true or not by some "intuitive"
: means (almost certainly by using whether its element count were
:
At 02:22 PM 8/26/00 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
It seems that it ought to be possible to evaluate something in a list
context and test whether there are any entries in the resulting list
without having to reevaluate the expression in a scalar context. The
work-around with the trinary
Reply on laptop in wilderness (no network) holydays me void this message by
other messages sent in my absence. Ignore if so.
On 5 Aug 2000 21:40:43 -, Perl6 RFC Librarian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
