In lists.projects.perl.meta, you wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:10:53PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote:
This is perhaps the 3rd recent "waiting for Larry" comment posted in the
last week. I don't mind waiting... good things take time.
We'll hang ourselves tommorrow... unless Larry comes. And
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:10:53PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote:
This is perhaps the 3rd recent "waiting for Larry" comment posted in the
last week. I don't mind waiting... good things take time.
We'll hang ourselves tommorrow... unless Larry comes. And if he
comes, we'll be saved.
--
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:10:53PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote:
o Will experiences from Ruby be assimilated back into Perl?
o What impact will C# and .NET have on Perl 6? Don't forget
Larry's required reading recommendation:
http://windows.oreilly.com/news/hejlsberg_0800.html
From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 07:20 PM 2/19/2001 -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
The RFC project should be ongoing and more adaptive.
It's my understanding that this is, in fact, the plan. The
only reason things have paused (and it is a pause, not a
stop) is that we're
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 01:32 PM 2/20/2001 -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Hmm, I think of Python as more Babbit than Mahler. Perl is ... John Cage?
Would that mean that perl 6 corresponds to 4'33"? (If I have the composers
right...)
As someone else pointed out, you are
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
valuable and interesting. (aside: Python is Mahler. Discuss.) So while we may
Hmm, I think of Python as more Babbit than Mahler. Perl is ... John Cage?
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==*/
At 01:32 PM 2/20/2001 -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
valuable and interesting. (aside: Python is Mahler. Discuss.) So while
we may
Hmm, I think of Python as more Babbit than Mahler. Perl is ... John Cage?
Would that mean that perl 6 corresponds to
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:33:48PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 01:32 PM 2/20/2001 -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
valuable and interesting. (aside: Python is Mahler. Discuss.) So while
we may
Hmm, I think of Python as more Babbit than Mahler.