On 2/26/07, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm. Let's see if there is a way I can help to get what I want
Assuming that the answer to my question in the other thread is "packed
arrays aren't implemented anywhere yet", are any implementations close
enough that I can trade te
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 14:16 -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Sunday 25 February 2007 13:57, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to say that the implementors should rush either, nor am I
> > complaining about current status; I grok the dynamics of volunteer code.
> > I merely disagree with t
Jonathan Lang writes:
> Smylers wrote:
>
> > Richard Hainsworth writes:
> >
> > > When does the specification of perl6 come to an end?
> >
> > At a guess: when it's implemented.
> >
> > Many of the recent changes have been made by Larry in response to his
> > trying to write the grammar, and e
On Sunday 25 February 2007 13:57, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> I'm not trying to say that the implementors should rush either, nor am I
> complaining about current status; I grok the dynamics of volunteer code.
> I merely disagree with the "spec is all-important" crowd. I personally
> have a prefe
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 13:26 -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:56, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned in another thread, but didn't make clear in that email: I
> > don't need a "finished" spec. I need the *current* version of spec to
> > actually be mostly impleme
On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:56, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> As I mentioned in another thread, but didn't make clear in that email: I
> don't need a "finished" spec. I need the *current* version of spec to
> actually be mostly implemented.
The implementors want the same thing.
> And if it's no
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 12:15 -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
> I submit that you'll have even more luck discouraging such things if
> you can give a reasonable and believable timeline as to when the 6.0
> spec will be ready and perl 6.1 features can start being considered.
As I mentioned in another thr
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:42:22AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
: When does the specification of perl6 come to an end? Are there criteria
: or milestones which define that the perl6 specification stage is at an end?
It seems you are presuming a Waterfall model of development here.
We're not d
Smylers wrote:
Richard Hainsworth writes:
> When does the specification of perl6 come to an end?
At a guess: when it's implemented.
Many of the recent changes have been made by Larry in response to his
trying to write the grammar, and encountering problems.
With all due respect:
Once the gra
Richard Hainsworth writes:
> When does the specification of perl6 come to an end?
At a guess: when it's implemented.
Many of the recent changes have been made by Larry in response to his
trying to write the grammer, and encountering problems.
> Perhaps there could be a perl6.0 specification, wi
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:42:22AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>
> While perl6 remains unstable in its specification (or is perceived to be
> that way) and is looking (from outside a select group?) like a unending
> road, wont this act as a deterrent to those who want to help hack it
> int
or include a disclaimer that they are outdated as juerd sugested,
or do both. anyway this is an issue since google finds the A and E first.
im really intrested if im with juerd the only one here seeing this as an
issue.
thanks
herbert
proton-ce.sf.net
> herbert (>), Richard (>>):
> > >(eg. How o
herbert (>), Richard (>>):
>(eg. How out of date are the Exegesis files?)
very *g* just use the synopsis *g*
Hm, it might actually be a good idea to port the code examples from
the Exegeses to current Perl6, preferably also runnable in Pugs. The
ported programs could be put under examples/ in
hi richard
>(eg. How out of date are the Exegesis files?)
very *g* just use the synopsis *g*
herbert
(proton-ce.sf.net)
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-
On Saturday 24 February 2007 22:42, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> But while perl6 continues
> its evolution, without a tangible end, few are going to dedicate time
> and effort to write documentation for such as me. (eg. How out of date
> are the Exegesis files?)
You could make a very similar argum
When does the specification of perl6 come to an end? Are there criteria
or milestones which define that the perl6 specification stage is at an end?
I can see that setting a time line is not easy because the effort is
volunteer based, but what about a "conceptual" end?
Perhaps there could be a
16 matches
Mail list logo
