On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, chromatic wrote:
On Friday 16 November 2007 06:22:27 Andy Dougherty wrote:
For the first time ever, I was able to successfully complete these two
tests:
t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.ok
355/960 skipped: various reasons
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 13:43:30 Andy Dougherty wrote:
Alas, binary searching has proven to be painfully slow, and just painful
to boot.
That's fine. I was just curious.
As for other tests, nothing appears to be gobbling up memory unreasonably.
Most of the test suite passes (maybe 30
On Friday 16 November 2007 06:22:27 Andy Dougherty wrote:
For the first time ever, I was able to successfully complete these two
tests:
t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.ok
355/960 skipped: various reasons
t/compilers/pge/p6regex/01-regex.ok
For the first time ever, I was able to successfully complete these two
tests:
t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.ok
355/960 skipped: various reasons
t/compilers/pge/p6regex/01-regex.ok
Somebody (most likely chromatic) has plugged a very big leak.
