Re: ps?

to "ps", but is there a way to tell if a program in running from Raku? Running ps is probably as good as anything, but in linux you could always just poke around under /proc, e.g. Loop over /proc/*/cmdline and look for it. Follow up: $PsStr = qqx ( ps ax ); if $PsSt

Re: ps?

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:29:13PM -0800, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote: > On 2020-11-13 18:26, Curt Tilmes wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:03 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users > > wrote: > > > Fedora 33 > > > > > > I know I can get this i

Re: ps?

On 2020-11-13 18:26, Curt Tilmes wrote: On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:03 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote: Fedora 33 I know I can get this information from a system call to "ps", but is there a way to tell if a program in running from Raku? Running ps is probably as good a

Re: ps?

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:03 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote: > Fedora 33 > > I know I can get this information from a system > call to "ps", but is there a way to tell if a > program in running from Raku? Running ps is probably as good as anything, but in linux y

ps?

Hi All, Fedora 33 I know I can get this information from a system call to "ps", but is there a way to tell if a program in running from Raku? Many thanks, -T

Re: clipboard and ps questions?

On 02/17/2017 06:38 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: 1) Is there a reliably Perl 6 way to copy things to the clipboard? (Perl 5 has a module, but it is unreliable and I have to make a system call.) In Linux, OS::Clipboard is using xclip and is writing to the "mouse over" and "center click"

Re: clipboard and ps questions?

On 02/23/2017 06:08 PM, yary wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:09 PM, ToddAndMargo > wrote: But ... it calls xclip (Linux), pbcopy (OS X), or clip (Windows), so you might as well call these programs directly with qx or qqx rather

Re: clipboard and ps questions?

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:09 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > But ... it calls xclip (Linux), pbcopy (OS X), or clip (Windows), > so you might as well call these programs directly with qx or qqx > rather than having to use Panda to compile the module > > For instance, under Perl

Re: clipboard and ps questions?

the module For instance, under Perl 5 (sorry no Perl 6 example yet): system ( "cat $TmpFile | xclip -selection clipboard" ); 2) Is there a way to get a list of running processes similar to "ps ax"? Just call "ps" directly with qx or qqx. For instance: my @ps

clipboard and ps questions?

of running processes similar to "ps ax"? Many thanks, -T -- ~ I am Windows I am the Blue Screen of Death No one hears your screams ~

Re: [PS] open patches

I resolved #24030 and #24038 by changing the Status field and hitting Save Changes, then I noticed there was a Resolve option on the top righthand side which asks for details for a notification email. I'm wondering which is the approved way? Either is fine. By default the Resolve page

Re: [PS] open patches

Reeducation succeeded. I resolved #24030 and #24038 by changing the Status field and hitting Save Changes, then I noticed there was a Resolve option on the top righthand side which asks for details for a notification email. I'm wondering which is the approved way? I ask because I'll add a

Re: [PS] open patches

On 30 Oct 2003, at 07:20, Robert Spier wrote: Some of patches on that list that are mine. #24030 Obsolete #24038 Obsolete #24043 Applied #24063 Applied #24177 Rejected #24188 Applied I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied. Any chance of that being changed so I could

Re: [PS] open patches

these are the patches of mine which still show as Pending: (17405) [PATCH] correct make pdb on Win32 (24149) [PATCH] small Makefile patch (rm *.s in realclean instead of clean) (24205) [PATCH] removing -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args for non x86 arch the last one was applied by Dan, but the

Re: [PS] open patches

My account (mikescott) at http://auth.perl.org/auth/account shows the correct email. The RT page assures me that I'm signed in as mikescott. I go to the Modify ticket #24030 and set Status to resolved, click Save Changes and get Status: Permission Denied. RT had a different idea of what

Re: [PS] open patches

(24205) [PATCH] removing -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args for non x86 arch the last one was applied by Dan, but the Status wasn't updated on RT. I can't do it myself (permission denied). I've updated the ticket. RT thinks your email address is @perl.it, but the ticket was created from the

Re: [PS] open patches

Some of patches on that list that are mine. #24030 Obsolete #24038 Obsolete #24043 Applied #24063 Applied #24177 Rejected #24188 Applied I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied. Any chance of that being changed so I could update them myself? Mike On Wednesday, Oct 22,

Re: [PS] open patches

Some of patches on that list that are mine. #24030 Obsolete #24038 Obsolete #24043 Applied #24063 Applied #24177 Rejected #24188 Applied I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied. Any chance of that being changed so I could update them myself? You have to log in

[PS] obsolete files

Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused: * ops2cgc.pl unused, functionality is in ops2c.pl * make.pl unused?, seems outdated * classes/csub.pmc AFAIK unused, we have NCI, method_util is outdated * classes/pointer.pmc used AFAIK only by rx.ops - should be a ManagedStruct If no

Re: [PS] obsolete files

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused: * ops2cgc.pl unused, functionality is in ops2c.pl * make.pl unused?, seems outdated * classes/csub.pmc AFAIK unused, we have NCI, method_util is outdated * classes/pointer.pmc

Re: [PS] obsolete files

Simon Glover wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused: Can I also suggest: optimizer.pl lib/Parrot/Optimizer.pm They haven't been touched for 20 months / 16 months respectively, I don't know of anybody using them, and I

Re: [PS] obsolete files

docs/parrot_assembly.pod is just an earlier version of PDD 6. On Thursday, Oct 23, 2003, at 18:34 Europe/Berlin, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Simon Glover wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused: Can I also suggest: optimizer.pl

Re: [PS] obsolete files

Leopold Toetsch wrote: Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused: Hmmm... obsolete... unused... sounds a lot like languages/perl6 :-P - Joe

[PS] open patches

of these patches got applied by myself, and I just forgot then. So lets please for the future try to not forget to mark patches applied/whatever and close after some time[1]. Thanks, leo [1] IIRC must close be done after sending the applied notice mail or that would reopen it. PS: I'd rather

Re: [PS] open patches

If anyone goes through that list and provides me with a list of needed updates (in a standardized format), I can do some bulk updates relatively easily. -R Leopold Toetsch wrote: http://www.parrotcode.org/openpatches/ shows a list of open patches ranging from #801 up to recent ones. Some of

Re: PS of Rewriting the assembler

At 11:45 AM -0800 2/27/02, Steve Fink wrote: [Simon/Dan: can I check in my regex compiler under languages/regex?] Yes. -- Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai