r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread pugs-commits
Author: particle Date: 2009-01-02 17:08:51 +0100 (Fri, 02 Jan 2009) New Revision: 24737 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod Log: [spec] add signature for perl6, and make --output-format entirely implementation-specific Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod ==

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread Geoffrey Broadwell
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 17:08 +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: > +=head2 Synopsis > + > + multi sub perl6( > +Bool :a($autosplit), > +Bool :c($check-syntax), > +Bool :$doc, > +:e($execute), > +:$execute-lax, #TODO fix illegal -e6 syntax. -6? not legal. -x? hrmm > +

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread jerry gay
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 17:08 +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: >> +=head2 Synopsis >> + >> + multi sub perl6( >> +Bool :a($autosplit), >> +Bool :c($check-syntax), >> +Bool :$doc, >> +:e($execute), >> +:$execute

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread Geoffrey Broadwell
Thank you for the quick turnaround! On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 10:55 -0800, jerry gay wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > > It's also not > > obvious what a boolean named $doc does -- which probably means either > > that it's not supposed to be a boolean, or it needs a s

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread jerry gay
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:24, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > Thank you for the quick turnaround! > > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 10:55 -0800, jerry gay wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: >> > It's also not >> > obvious what a boolean named $doc does -- which probably means e

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread Geoffrey Broadwell
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote: > oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and > forgot to address the item here. C replaces p5's > C (that's the latest idea from damian, although it seems not > to be published yet). Ah, I get it! What about perldoc's spe

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-02 Thread jason switzer
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote: > > oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and > > forgot to address the item here. C replaces p5's > > C (that's the latest idea from damian, although it seems n

Re: r24737 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-03 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* jerry gay [2009-01-02 21:30]: > the most likely short names, C<< < -d -o -c > >> are all taken > by either p5 or p6 command-line. Is `-q` taken? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //