Re: special named assertions

2006-09-27 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
rtain named assertions receive special treatment in the engine. Thanks, Pm > -- Original message -- > From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:59:32AM -0700, David Brunton wrote: > > > A qu

Re: special named assertions

2006-09-27 Thread mark . a . biggar
ed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:59:32AM -0700, David Brunton wrote: > > A quick scan of S05 reveals definitions for these seven special named > assertions: > > [...] > > I don't think that <'...'> or <"..."> are really "named assertions&quo

Re: special named assertions

2006-09-27 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:59:32AM -0700, David Brunton wrote: > A quick scan of S05 reveals definitions for these seven special named > assertions: > [...] I don't think that <'...'> or <"..."> are really "named assertions". I think

special named assertions

2006-09-27 Thread David Brunton
>From an IRC conversation earlier today: A quick scan of S05 reveals definitions for these seven special named assertions: <'...'> Twenty-four more are listed in docs/Perl6/Overview/Rule.pod (some of which are used in S05, but I don't thi