On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Will Coleda wrote:
Good! [inline] isn't real Tcl, it's specific to partcl.
That test consists of the code:
inline PASM {
print ok\n
}
which should do the obvious thing. Odd that it's squawking about MMD_add.
It's very strange. It copied that snippet above
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Will Coleda wrote:
Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with leo's recent fixes,
hopefully this means on all platforms for real this time. =-)
This should also fix the problem on windows, as the missing functions have
been uncommented, and are now available.
Good! [inline] isn't real Tcl, it's specific to partcl.
That test consists of the code:
inline PASM {
print ok\n
}
which should do the obvious thing. Odd that it's squawking about
MMD_add.
Can you 1) try this PIR, and 2) if that *works*, copy that tcl
snippet to examples/foo.tcl,
I can confirm that all tests are now passing on Linux/x86 with r9202.
--
All tests successful.
Files=47, Tests=446, 40 wallclock secs (28.78 cusr + 4.18 csys = 32.96 CPU)
--
-J
--
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:24:09PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with
Minor change to the exception PMC in the leo-ct5 branch - all
exception class tests pass, but this version allows HLLs to use two
slots in the exception object as a stopgap.
This came up as I'm in near the end of converting tcl in leo-ctx5:
versions to date have used two return codes to
Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with leo's recent
fixes, hopefully this means on all platforms for real this time. =-)
This should also fix the problem on windows, as the missing functions
have been uncommented, and are now available.
Please svn up and retest.
On Sep 15,
