Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:11, Zoffix Znet via RT > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: >> See this... > > See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were > fallout: > raschipi, gfldex, timtoady already said he'd retract the

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:11, Zoffix Znet via RT > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: >> See this... > > See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were > fallout: > raschipi, gfldex, timtoady already said he'd retract the

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 17:50, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #131919] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Dis

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 17:50, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #131919] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Dis

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:11:21 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > To me, it looks like a clear case for 6.d material. We made a promise > to users that we won't make changes that break 6.c-errata changes and > IMO the 6.c-errata roast changes due to this feature break that > promise. Though, since it'

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:11:21 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > To me, it looks like a clear case for 6.d material. We made a promise > to users that we won't make changes that break 6.c-errata changes and > IMO the 6.c-errata roast changes due to this feature break that > promise. Though, since it'

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > See this... See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were fallout: raschipi, gfldex, timtoady already said he'd retract the commit if there's ecosystem fallout, which you just demonstrated https:

[perl #131915] [REGRESSION] Proc using more memory since being a Proc::Async

2017-08-17 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-08-17#i_15032963 On 2017-08-16 14:30:42, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > TL;DR it went from 59820 to 215976 after this commit: > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/92bd7e4f54a92fa660f99b4d056d33a08fb98bd2 > > Bisect log: > https://gist.github.com/67

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #131919] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131919 > See this commit: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/9501edae4f7

[perl #131857] [REGRESSION] Aliased named parameters broke in a recent MoarVM commit

2017-08-17 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:48:36 -0700, ddgr...@gmail.com wrote: > [22:44] m: sub foo(:color(:$colour)) { $colour + 1 }; my > $s; > for ^100 { $s += foo(:color($_)) }; say $s; say now - INIT now > [22:44] <+camelia> rakudo-moar a91ad2: OUTPUT: «Unexpected named > argument > 'color' passed␤ in sub

[perl #131857] [REGRESSION] Aliased named parameters broke in a recent MoarVM commit

2017-08-17 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:48:36 -0700, ddgr...@gmail.com wrote: > [22:44] m: sub foo(:color(:$colour)) { $colour + 1 }; my > $s; > for ^100 { $s += foo(:color($_)) }; say $s; say now - INIT now > [22:44] <+camelia> rakudo-moar a91ad2: OUTPUT: «Unexpected named > argument > 'color' passed␤ in sub

[perl #131914] [REGRESSION] Rakudo/Moar taking more memory at launch.

2017-08-17 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:53:05 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Also, it's not any different on HEAD: > > committable6test: 9658dd98c9dd8ec^^,9658dd98c9dd8ec,HEAD > say > "/proc/$*PID/statm".IO.lines[0].split(/\s/)[5] * 4096 / 1024 > AlexDaniel, ¦9658dd98c9dd8ec^^: «58628» ¦9658dd9: > «138

[perl #131914] [REGRESSION] Rakudo/Moar taking more memory at launch.

2017-08-17 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:53:05 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Also, it's not any different on HEAD: > > committable6test: 9658dd98c9dd8ec^^,9658dd98c9dd8ec,HEAD > say > "/proc/$*PID/statm".IO.lines[0].split(/\s/)[5] * 4096 / 1024 > AlexDaniel, ¦9658dd98c9dd8ec^^: «58628» ¦9658dd9: > «138