Hmmm…. I guess this one does… good point! :-)
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:57, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
> wrote:
>
> Does it mean that this now needs tests?
>
> On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT >> follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>>
Hmmm…. I guess this one does… good point! :-)
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:57, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
> wrote:
>
> Does it mean that this now needs tests?
>
> On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT >> follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>>
Does it mean that this now needs tests?
On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
> > On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT > follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> >> The "s
> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT
> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
>> The "solution", IMO, would not be to make your quoted example work (by
>> adding further special cases to the retu
> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT
> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
>> The "solution", IMO, would not be to make your quoted example work (by
>> adding further special cases to the retu
Rejecting 'cause it's a misunderstanding of how things work in OP.
Opened the suggestion for making `%` sigil work in
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/1203
Rejecting 'cause it's a misunderstanding of how things work in OP.
Opened the suggestion for making `%` sigil work in
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/1203
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > Set operators are a lot less useful with mutable types, like SetHash,
> > because
> > even when one of the operands is a SetHash, they still return a Set,
> > making
> > cons
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > Set operators are a lot less useful with mutable types, like SetHash,
> > because
> > even when one of the operands is a SetHash, they still return a Set,
> > making
> > cons
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> Set operators are a lot less useful with mutable types, like SetHash,
> because
> even when one of the operands is a SetHash, they still return a Set,
> making
> constructs like `∖=` or `∪=` entirely unusable:
>
> my $days = SetHash.new:
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #132352]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132352 >
Set operators are a lot less useful with mutable types, like SetHash, because
even when on
11 matches
Mail list logo