Yes, languages should now use IMCC as their target. Basically, they
generate IMCC instructions without regards for optimization and such so that
only a lexer/parser is needed. Take a look at the bf and ook languages for
an example. I think perl6 is also heading there.
Tanton
- Original Mess
Hey folks -
In my wanders through the parrot/languages subdirectories, it appears that
most example languages implement a complete compiler (ie lexxer -> parser
-> optimizer -> code emitter), which seems to be somewhat of a
duplication of labour. Has or is anyone worked on a framework a la gcc
w
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I think we can stand 3 failing tests for one or two days, when the
reason is well known.
Three? Every test fails under OS X because of this...
Oops, dynamic vs static NCI..., sorry.
If not done yet, I'll fix this tomorrow.
leo
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
>
> > In this case, I suspect it's failing to match "pIt", which was recently
> > added to interpeter.c:setup_default_compreg().
>
> Nothing to suspect here ;-)
> In "[CVS ci] eval #1" I wrote:
>
> Missing and left for
At 9:38 PM +0100 1/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
In this case, I suspect it's failing to match "pIt", which was recently
added to interpeter.c:setup_default_compreg().
Nothing to suspect here ;-)
In "[CVS ci] eval #1" I wrote:
Missing and left for an exercise fo
Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
In this case, I suspect it's failing to match "pIt", which was recently
added to interpeter.c:setup_default_compreg().
Nothing to suspect here ;-)
In "[CVS ci] eval #1" I wrote:
Missing and left for an exercise for Joe Other Parrothacker:
build_nativecall.pl lac
At 6:42 PM + 1/17/03, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #20374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20374 >
The Solaris tinderboxes are fa
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #20374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20374 >
The Solaris tinderboxes are failing with the unhelpful message
"PANIC: Unknown signat
--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:21:33PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Sorry this one sat. I want to apply it, but the test patch looks to
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:53:25PM +, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> > For the operator 'abs' I use the func
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:21:33PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Sorry this one sat. I want to apply it, but the test patch looks to
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:53:25PM +, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> For the operator 'abs' I use the functions 'abs()' and 'fabs()' from the
> C math library. '
At 4:53 PM + 1/14/03, Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
I have been looking at the ops 'neg' and 'abs' in core.ops. I have been
adding testcase in t/op/arithmetics.t and found a couple of problematic
cases.
Sorry this one sat. I want to apply it, but the test patch looks to
be reversed,
At 3:03 PM -0800 1/15/03, Jonathan Sillito wrote:
Sounds like we want objects *and* classes to support:
static_attribs - which are defined at compile time and
accessed by offset probably stored in an array.
dynamic_attribs - which come and go at run time and are
generally accessed by name and li
At 8:54 PM + 1/15/03, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:00:59AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:53 PM -0800 1/14/03, Adriano wrote:
>I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for returning a
>method (as an object) which can be invoked later with some arguments
>(or
At 3:06 PM -0500 1/15/03, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:57:28AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 9:37 PM -0500 1/14/03, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
>But who knows, maybe it could be made modular enough (i.e., more
>interface-oriented?) to allow the best of both worlds -
At 9:38 AM -0800 1/15/03, Jonathan Sillito wrote:
I realize this will vary from language to language, but generally we will
need a PMC that encapsulates a method (and responds to the invoke vtable
method like Sub, or maybe the Sub PMC could do?). This python code is
interesting:
a = A()
a.f()
At 11:44 AM -0600 1/15/03, Garrett Goebel wrote:
From: attriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > >I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for
>> > >returning a method (as an object) which can be invoked
>> > >later with some arguments (or even applied with a
>> > >partial list of argum
Here is a snippet from my last check in:
..
/cvs/public/parrot/include/parrot/interpreter.h,v <-- interpreter.h
new revision: 1.62; previous revision: 1.61
done
Cannot open file /tmp/#cvs.lastdir.27414: No such file or directory
Access allowed: Pers
At 11:44 AM -0500 1/15/03, attriel wrote:
>> > >I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for
> >returning a method (as an object) which can be invoked
> >later with some arguments (or even applied with a
> >partial list of arguments for currying).
> >
> >This would be a lot more usef
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
However, perl6 seems to be breaking. "Seems" meaning that 100% of
the tests are failing. This is bad.error (test.warn) of:
I did make a little change in imcc.l, but I have no difference in test
results.
$ make test
$ perl6 --test -r
both give
At 10:28 AM -0600 1/15/03, Garrett Goebel wrote:
Peter Haworth wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Adriano wrote:
> >
> >I think what Jonathan asked for was an operator for
> >returning a method (as an object) which can be invoked
> >later with some arguments (or even applied with a
> >partial li
cool!
i will try that out.
mike
--- Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:46:21AM -0800, Marc M. Adkins wrote:
> > I have a Perl program that processes Perl source and generates fake
> C++
> > headers that doxygen will process. Doxygen doesn't have a hook for
> add
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:46:21AM -0800, Marc M. Adkins wrote:
> I have a Perl program that processes Perl source and generates fake C++
> headers that doxygen will process. Doxygen doesn't have a hook for adding a
I've done the same thing, you can get it or see the output here:
http://smop.org/
Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
After a complete cygwin reinstall, I've finally gotten parrot to
install and pass 100% tests. Ok, great.
However, perl6 seems to be breaking. "Seems" meaning that 100% of
the tests are failing. This is bad.error (test.warn) of:
last token = []
(error) line 27: parse e
Dear list,
Please excuse my ignorance, and if the answer is just RTFM, then please
shoot me.
What is the plan for declaring "Object Oriented APIs" in parrot.
In dotnet il, you have a OO concept built into the assembly,
but parrot seems to be missing this. Is there a plan for supporting
the high l
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Tupshin Harper said:
> The ability to download autodia off of the primary site and the mirror
> is unfortunately broken.
Fwd-d to the author and apparently it's fixed now.
Simon
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
So it seems, that for multiple code segments, we'll have to take the
PackFile_ConstTable out of the structure and include
file/line/debug/whatever information. This would look like:
packfile aka interpreter->code:
- constants
- code_segment[]
- byte_code
- byte_c
After a complete cygwin reinstall, I've finally gotten parrot to
install and pass 100% tests. Ok, great.
However, perl6 seems to be breaking. "Seems" meaning that 100% of
the tests are failing. This is bad.
I've mananged to trace the error to the imcc phase. The outputted
imcc code seems corr
27 matches
Mail list logo
