At 7:58 PM + 6/16/03, Jonathan Sillito (via RT) wrote:
[perl #22633] [PATCH] convert parrot to continuation passing style" is
outdated. Attached is a less ambitious patch to convert parrot to
continuation passing style. Here is a summary of the ops (recall that the
continuation gets stored in P
I've decided part of the implementation for objects, and started in
on the ops for them. Right now it's just a sketch, but the following
ops are going in:
newclass Px, Sy
Creates a new, standalone class named Sy, class PMC put in Px.
subclass Px, [SPy], [Sz]
Subclass $2, and put the new subcl
[my last 2 f'ups didn't arrive at perl.perl6.internals, so I try again]
The patch is fine with two exceptions:
1) still breaks existing P6C tests WRT exceptions & rules
2) performance of CPS sucks
ad 1) I'd like to preserve the old style invoke/ret scheme too. incokecc
and friends could call a new
> -Original Message-
> From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The patch is fine with two exceptions:
> 1) still breaks existing P6C tests WRT exceptions & rules
> 2) performance of CPS sucks
>
> ad 1) I'd like to preserve the old style invoke/ret scheme too. incokecc
> and frie
Jonathan Sillito wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The patch is fine with two exceptions:
1) still breaks existing P6C tests WRT exceptions & rules
You didn't mention this point. It might be only a small change in P6C
code, I didn't look at (4 tes
> -Original Message-
> From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jonathan Sillito wrote:
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>The patch is fine with two exceptions:
> >>1) still breaks existing P6C tests WRT exceptions & rul
Jonathan Sillito wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok then we need a new opcode:
newsub Px, .Class, jump_or_ret_addr
Sounds fine to me. At one point the following worked:
new Px, .Class, address
Extending the C opcode or doing a new one isn'
At 02:34 AM 6/19/2003 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jonathan Sillito wrote:
(3) One other efficiency thought: I wonder if the interpreter's context
could be changed to a pointer to struct Parrot_Context? This would make
accessing the stacks slightly slower but would of course make restoring the
con
At 5:07 PM +0200 6/18/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[my last 2 f'ups didn't arrive at perl.perl6.internals, so I try again]
The patch is fine with two exceptions:
1) still breaks existing P6C tests WRT exceptions & rules
Yeah, that needs fixing.
2) performance of CPS sucks
Are you sure? Tell us what
At 10:23 PM -0400 6/18/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 02:34 AM 6/19/2003 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jonathan Sillito wrote:
(3) One other efficiency thought: I wonder if the interpreter's context
could be changed to a pointer to struct Parrot_Context? This would make
accessing the stacks slightly sl
10 matches
Mail list logo
