Dan Sugalski wrote:
Separate op won't work for Python. Consider:
def f(x,y): return x+y
print f(5,6) # 11
print f("a","b") # ab
Oh, sure it'd work, if you had an ADD_OR_CONCATENATE op with an
appropriate MMD table. :)
Conceptually, "+" is not an op at all in Python, it is syntatic sugar
At 2:03 PM -0400 10/11/04, Sam Ruby wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:23 PM -0400 10/9/04, Michal wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Sam Ruby wrote:
Inheritance can reduce the combinatorial problem, but it can introduce a
precendence question. The most interesting case still seems to be:
mmd_lookup(MM
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 14:03, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Here's a script that will run in both Python and Perl. It simply will
> return different results.
>
>print "1" + "2","\n",;
>print "45%s8" % "7","\n",;
>print 45 / 7 ,"\n",;
>print ['a','b','c'],"\n",;
>
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:23 PM -0400 10/9/04, Michal wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Sam Ruby wrote:
Inheritance can reduce the combinatorial problem, but it can
introduce a
precendence question. The most interesting case still seems to be:
mmd_lookup(MMD_ADD, PerlString, PyString)
What if, as
At 1:35 PM +0200 10/8/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The biggest problem with the message is that it never tells you exactly
*which* file was not found.
Is the error message now more informative?
In the runtime/parrot/library/ directory, the string
'libncur
At 12:01 AM +0200 10/10/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know what happend with http://tinderbox.perl.org?
It is offline for quite some time now :-(
It died as part of the meltdown of onion a while back. It's on the
list 'o things to get back, but it hasn't gotten there yet. I'll go
nudge an
At 4:23 PM -0400 10/9/04, Michal wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Sam Ruby wrote:
Inheritance can reduce the combinatorial problem, but it can introduce a
precendence question. The most interesting case still seems to be:
mmd_lookup(MMD_ADD, PerlString, PyString)
What if, as a fallback mechanism,
At 4:58 PM -0700 10/2/04, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
Dan et al. --
I made a new version of the script that creates gen.cpp and gen.imc
(attached). You can run it like this:
perl gen-pra.pl 1000 1
(for 1000 labels and 1 variables) and it will create equivalent
gen.imc and gen.cpp files. You ca
Lightweight Languages 2004 (LL4)
=
http://ll4.csail.mit.edu/
Saturday, Dec. 4, 2004
MIT Stata Center, Cambridge MA
Call for Presentations
LL4 will be an intense, exciting, one-day forum bringing together the
best programming language implementors and researchers, from bot
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Clites
# Please include the string: [perl #31932]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31932 >
Just a slight improvement in the logic used to find the PID of the
process to signal.
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Clites
# Please include the string: [perl #31930]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31930 >
This patch causes src tests to use the shared libparrot, if it exists.
This speeds th
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Clites
# Please include the string: [perl #31928]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31928 >
This patch makes scan_paths() copy the passed-in string, since strsep
will modify it
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Clites
# Please include the string: [perl #31927]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31927 >
Here is a patch with a few more fixes w.r.t. shared libs v. runtime
loadable libs, mo
At 8:37 AM -0400 10/11/04, William Coleda wrote:
This is set to go, pending an article on use.perl.org.
If Leo's comfortable that things are Working Fine, then push it out
to parrotcode.org.
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 3:41 PM +0200 10/10/04, Jerome Quelin wrote:
Hey guys,
We should update http://www.
This is set to go, pending an article on use.perl.org.
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 3:41 PM +0200 10/10/04, Jerome Quelin wrote:
Hey guys,
We should update http://www.parrotcode.org to reflect the latest version
since 0.1.1 is out!
Is it something underway waiting for sync, or is it a forgetting?
Probab
Nicholas Clark wrote:
The convention for perl5's tests isn't quite settled yet, but it seems to be
evolving to PERL_CORE being in the environment for the test scripts
Parrot now checks the env var PARROT_TEST. If it's defined, the runtime
--prefix is ignored.
leo
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:25:49AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Short version: an installed Parrot is now able to locate its ICU data.
>>
>> The longer story: During "make" a new file src/parrot_config.c is
>> created holding currently just one entry:
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # cb didnt run
Yep. Callbacks are all considered being asynchronous. That means:
running callbacks need the event loop running, which isn't the case for
Windows.
These tests should be skipped on Win32 and moved to event.t or similar.
Additionally it woul
18 matches
Mail list logo
