On Feb 20, 2006, at 16:21, Karl Forner wrote:
I was expecting this kind of answer (Just Do It) ;-)
Where/How could I add this kind of FAQ ?
Write a draft, post it here for comments. Then polish it up and if it
looks good, one of us will commit it.
What you add may fit as a patch to docs/g
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #38598]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38598 >
Hi there,
The old PIR subroutine attributes ("method", "@MULTI", "@MAIN", "@LOAD",
"@IMM
I've spent a lot of time looking for something that would work(and
found some stuff that documentation seemed to say should work but
didn't for me), and on darwin, that's the only way I know how, either
that or a static parrot. The only other option I can think of that
would perhaps do the tri
Is there some reason that this can't be a -L flag passed to CC? IMHO -
it's bad policy to go littering makefile with env variable declaration
as the effect is global until the end of the makefile.
-J
--
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:40:24PM -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> It was working on 11676, and I
It was working on 11676, and I got it to build with 11686. But I
notice one problem: "Library not loaded:
/usr/local/lib/libparrot.dylib"
On darwin, if you want a shared parrot, you must set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
to include parrot's blib/lib.
For tcsh(os x default), it'd be "setenv DYLD_LIBRARY
And what about Null? And if they're not equal, what effect would that
have on sorting? Although for sorting, I guess that NaN != NaN would
have the some issue, but undef values in an array are more likely.
On Feb 20, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
Can we get a design descisi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:03:59AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:44, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have
> >disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either.
>
> It used bogus high numbers beyond
On 2/21/06, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 9:56, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> >
> >> P.S
> >> I suppose that I'm not the only one willing to help facing this
> >> difficulty.
> >> Maybe a tutorial or a FAQ could attract more contributors ?
> >>
> > Yes.
>
> In fa
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:28, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >Is this really worth doing? Since profiling flags are compiler
> >specific
> >isn't it better to just let them be set as additional CFLAGS?
>
> How do I add to CFLA
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:01:11AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:25, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >This flag is in use by the inter::exp step but it's not doing much.
> >Should this flag be kept or not?
>
> I'd remove it,
The whole step or just the flag?
-J
--
I apologize for my probably naive question...
Trying to decipher t/pmc/array.t, I began wondering what happens if you set
a negative length to an array.
It lead me to array.pmc::set_integer_native, which just forwards its size
argument to list.c::list_set_length
without any check.
list_set_leng
On Feb 20, 2006, at 9:56, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
P.S
I suppose that I'm not the only one willing to help facing this
difficulty.
Maybe a tutorial or a FAQ could attract more contributors ?
Yes.
In fact, this may be the best place you can start, even if it's only
in the form of "he
On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:44, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have
disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either.
It used bogus high numbers beyond int32 range and was just broken.
leo
On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:28, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
Is this really worth doing? Since profiling flags are compiler
specific
isn't it better to just let them be set as additional CFLAGS?
How do I add to CFLAGS from the perl Configure.pl command?
leo
On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:25, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
This flag is in use by the inter::exp step but it's not doing much.
Should this flag be kept or not?
I'd remove it,
leo
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38597]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38597 >
r11684
make realclean
CXX='ccache g++-4.0'
CC='ccache gcc-4.0'
/usr/bin/perl Configure.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:06:36AM +1100, Sisyphus wrote:
> Yes, /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf.
Perhaps you need to run `ldconfig` as root.
> $LD_LIBRARY_PATH is initially empty. If I don't add '/usr/local/lib' to it,
> then when I run 'parrot hello.pir', I get (transcribed):
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl 6 Internals"
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Building parrot-0.4.1 on Win32
> On 2/20/06, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh one other thing ...
What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have
disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either.
-J
--
No one ever made any actualy attempt to impliment the build in scons,
makepp, etc. and since we're moving towards Configure in PASM/miniparrot
I'm going to close out this bug.
-J
--
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 29 18:22:10 2004]:
>
>
> This code:
>
> new P0, .Undef
> new P1, .Undef
> eq P0, P1, L1
> print "not "
> L1: print "ok\n"
> end
>
> prints "not ok". Should it? If Parrot considers every Undef PMC to
> be distinct, it's going to ma
> [coke - Sun Aug 15 13:41:43 2004]:
>
> Add profiling build options
>
> (From the TODO file)
>
>
Is this really worth doing? Since profiling flags are compiler specific
isn't it better to just let them be set as additional CFLAGS?
-J
--
This flag is in use by the inter::exp step but it's not doing much.
Should this flag be kept or not?
-J
--
On Feb 20, 2006, at 18:25, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
Is there a performance penalty for having these methods?
No, just a bit of more code size. Well, looks like compiler writers
wants these methods, so we'll keep 'em.
leo
Karl Forner schrieb:
Hi all,
I'd really like to try helping developing Perl6 and Parrot, I subscribed to
the mailing-list, read some docs, got and compiled
parrot via svn (in a vmware-played ubuntu ;-) ).
Welcome Karl.
But it is not obvious to see where to begin, and where I can be usefu
Bob Rogers schrieb:
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:55:03 +0100
in order to store the contents of a PMC into a boolean array? What do I
et al. I think, if you use a BooleanArray with compact storage you are
knowing why and don't need automatic conver
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:55:03 +0100
*) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
set P0[0], 3.2
set P0[1], "foo"
set P0[2], P1
So I would need to do
set I1, P1
set P0[2], I1
in order to store the cont
Leo~
On 2/20/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *) the resizable variant is heavily borked WRT allocation size
> fixes welcome
>
> *) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
>
>set P0[0], 3.2
>set P0[1], "foo"
>set P0[2], P1
>
> nor
>
>set N0, P[0]
>.
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #38594]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38594 >
PASM/PIR source line info is off by one (at least) on several instructions.
Please
*) the resizable variant is heavily borked WRT allocation size
fixes welcome
*) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
set P0[0], 3.2
set P0[1], "foo"
set P0[2], P1
nor
set N0, P[0]
...
et al. I think, if you use a BooleanArray with compact storage you are
knowing why
Folks, developers, countrymen,
the next release will go out soon (very likely this Wed), which means:
* no more feature changes to parrot core, config, libs
* bug fixes, documentation updates are very welcome as well as:
* test results, smoke and PLATFORMS updates
Thanks,
leo
Hi all,
I'd really like to try helping developing Perl6 and Parrot, I subscribed to
the mailing-list, read some docs, got and compiled
parrot via svn (in a vmware-played ubuntu ;-) ).
But it is not obvious to see where to begin, and where I can be useful.
My main objective is to have a fast, rel
On 2/20/06, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh one other thing on Linux I had to add (the standard location)
> /usr/local/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I've not had to do that before ... and
> the README suggests that I shouldn't have to do it wrt parrot. It says:
>
> "But please note th
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Worthington"
.
.
> So
> I guess one answer is to try the latest Parrot, either from SVN or by
> downloading a snapshot:
> http://svn.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/
>
Thanks for the reply, Jonathan. A few things came up and I've not been able
to get back u
34 matches
Mail list logo
