explicitconf branch merged into trunk in r24294.
Implemented chromatic's suggestion in r24283: using
Test::Harness::runtests() instead of prove.
# New Ticket Created by Flavio Poletti
# Please include the string: [perl #49202]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49202 >
Hi,
I encountered a couple of problems with lib/SmartLinks.pm. In
particular, its
I'm closing this ticket for a number of reasons.
1. The "subroutine redefined" problem -- the original focus of the RT
-- is, I think, largely a Devel::Cover problem. More of an annoyance
than anything else.
2. The other problem I discussed -- the spurious test failures while
running Devel::Co
On Saturday 29 December 2007 18:13:26 chromatic wrote:
> As of r24274:
Let's call that r24276.
> $ perl Configure.pl
> $ make pbc_to_c.pir
... and this should be:
$ make pbc_to_c
> $ cd languages/perl6
> $ make
> $ ../../parrot pbc_to_c.pir perl6.pbc
...
As of r24274:
$ perl Configure.pl
$ make pbc_to_c.pir
$ cd languages/perl6
$ make
$ ../../parrot pbc_to_c.pir perl6.pbc
$ cd ../..
$ languages/perl6/perl6 languages/perl6/t/01-sanity/01-tap.t
1..10
ok 1
ok 2
o
On Sat Dec 29 15:57:14 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, I'm having problems with 3 of the coding standards tests on
> these 2 files:
>
> config/auto/cpu/i386/memcpy_mmx.c
> config/auto/cpu/i386/memcpy_sse.c
>
> They're causing failures in:
>
> t/codingstd/c_indent.t
> t/codingstd/copyr
On Sat Dec 29 11:37:49 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Smoke test results have been favorable, so I will now proceed to
> renaming gen::cpu to auto::cpu, the better to reflect its character as
> probe.
I moved these files. All configuration tests are passing.
However, I'm having problems with 3
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:13:19PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 29 December 2007 01:29:46 Allison Randal wrote:
>
> > > * convert perl6.pbc into a C executable
>
> > Possible, but ultimately too constraining. There are significant
> > advantages to having the full Parrot runtime environm
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:29:46AM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
> Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
> >* add some smarts to Parrot to allow it to search/execute .pbc files
> > in some standard locations (RT#47992)
>
> We certainly need to allow configurable search paths (at runtime and
> compile
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:04:09PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
> Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
> >
> >Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
> >throws a cryptic exception message like:
> >
> >Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
> >
> >A better
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:11:23PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2007 16:16:55 Patrick R.Michaud wrote:
>
> > Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
> > throws a cryptic exception message like:
> >
> > Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::
Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
James E Keenan wrote:
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
Forgot to tell it.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
t/library/mime_base64.t(Wstat: 6 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Can you send
c: Alberto Simões reported (new?) errors in
t/compilers/json/to_parrot.t on list today.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
See attached.
Can you take a look? thanks.
kid51
to_parrot.err
Description: Binary data
chromatic wrote:
Don't reject this out of hand. The C executables generated from pbc2c link
against libparrot, so they have the full Parrot runtime environment
available. Basically, this code replaces src/main.c with src/perl6pbc.c and
a few lines that create a new Parrot interpreter and gi
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:47:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + while (flags && idx < sizeof(buf)-100) {
Is 100 the length of everything in flag_names appended together?
-- c
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
In order to solve that, adding a :invocant('any') (* a special marker would
be more convenient, maybe someone would like to define a class 'any' (you
never know :-) but that's beside the pointnow *)
By adding these markers, what effectively happens is that all :invocant
pa
From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:08:10 +0200
Looks good. Go ahead and commit. Better abstraction for signature
decoding can be added later.
Allison
Thanks; done in r24268. I also changed it to use PIR syntax, so we
wouldn't have a new syntax to
On Dec 29, 2007 11:34 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
> >
> > Earlier I read over this, thinking: there's probably a good reason for
> that
> > (the need for being contiguous), but I haven't figured it out yet.
> > For sake of documentation, could you please e
On Saturday 29 December 2007 01:29:46 Allison Randal wrote:
> > * convert perl6.pbc into a C executable
> Possible, but ultimately too constraining. There are significant
> advantages to having the full Parrot runtime environment available.
Don't reject this out of hand. The C executables gener
Smoke test results have been favorable, so I will now proceed to
renaming gen::cpu to auto::cpu, the better to reflect its character as
probe.
Hi
James E Keenan wrote:
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
Forgot to tell it.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
t/library/mime_base64.t(Wstat: 6 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Can you send output of prove -v?
Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
Probably this is all known, but as I am quite out from Parrot lately,
and just wanted to try a make test under Perl 6, today I compiled
Parrot, and run a make test.
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
This was the result:
Test Summary Report
---
Andy Lester wrote:
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets the
last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a PMC.
That should never be negative.
Unless someone wants
Please review the patch attached, which proposes adding a new Parrot
configuration step, auto::fink, for the purpose of locating the Fink
directories needed for three later configuration steps.
Adding config/auto/fink.pm and 9 test files. Modifying
Parrot::Configure::Step::List, the 3 affected co
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets
the last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a
PMC. That should never be negative.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: allison
Date: Sat Dec 29 09:14:50 2007
New Revision: 24265
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd25_concurrency.pod
Log:
[pdd] Completing truncated sentence in Concurrency PDD.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd25_concurrency.pod
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 December 2007 07:09:24 Andy Lester wrote:
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a patch to
convert them and s
Hi
Probably this is all known, but as I am quite out from Parrot lately,
and just wanted to try a make test under Perl 6, today I compiled
Parrot, and run a make test.
This was the result:
Test Summary Report
---
t/configure/115-auto_warnings-01.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 F
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Earlier I read over this, thinking: there's probably a good reason for that
(the need for being contiguous), but I haven't figured it out yet.
For sake of documentation, could you please explain why this is so?
so, why would it not be possible to write this:
sub foo :mult
Bob Rogers wrote:
The attached patch adds decoding of call/return registers to the
disassembler, and also fixes a segfault; both are byproducts of a long
and otherwise fruitless debugging session. Please let me know what you
think.
Looks good. Go ahead and commit. Better abstraction for sig
Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
throws a cryptic exception message like:
Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
A better exception message would be something like:
Perl6::Grammar ("2") child of PAST::Op c
Will Coleda wrote:
Yes, it would be specified as Int/Str/Num in the signature. But
then invoking the multi with an I register or integer constant
should recognize 'Int' as being a match, and not just 'Integer'.
My concern here is HLL interop. I think it would be cleaner to specify
the base t
Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
Currently the most frequently asked question (by far) about perl6
is "how can I just get an executable that I can use to run Perl
6 programs?"
At present this isn't possible, the best we can offer is
"/path/to/parrot/parrot /path/to/parrot/languages/perl6/p
On second look, it appears that PGE is doing the correct thing, and the
problem we were seeing that triggered this ticket was due to a GC bug.
So, never mind!
Thanks,
Pm
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 05:12:24PM -0800, Christopher Pruden wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Christopher Pruden
> # Please include the string: [perl #49085]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49085 >
>
>
>
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:01:22PM -0800, Stephen Weeks wrote:
> Working on getting parrot to parse the lojban grammar, I found that it
> would hang forever with --target=parse. Tracked it down to a rule.
> When I define a custom token ws in the grammar, it parses without
> problem.
>
> Built a
Please see the refactored version of config/auto/perldoc.pm and two test
files, t/configure/147-auto_perldoc-01.t and -02.t, which were committed
in or before r24258.
I had intended to submit these as a patch to list, but my SVN sandbox
got confused today during theh planned outage, and everthing
On Friday 28 December 2007 16:16:55 Patrick R.Michaud wrote:
> Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
> throws a cryptic exception message like:
>
> Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
>
> A better exception message would be something like:
>
> Pe
39 matches
Mail list logo
